ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A method to compress and anonymize packet traces
Full text PdfPdf (792 KB)
Source Internet Measurement Conference archive
Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet Measurement table of contents
San Francisco, California, USA
Session: Dealing with high speed links and other measurement challenges table of contents
Pages: 257 - 261  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-435-5
Author
Markus Peuhkuri  Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 37,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/505202.505233
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Data volume and privacy issues are one of problems related to large-scale packet capture. Utilizing flow nature of Internet traffic can reduce data volume. Removing sensitive information such as IP addresses enchanges privacy. Our method makes possible to have same replacement value for given IP address even if capture location or time is different.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
V. Jacobson, "Compressing TCP/IP headers for low-speed serial links," Request for Comments RFC 1144, Internet Engineering Task Force, Feb. 1990.
 
2
M. Degermark, B. Nordgren, and S. Pink, "IP Header Compression," Request for Comments RFC 2507, Internet Engineering Task Force, Feb. 1999.
 
3
K.C. Claffy, H.-W. Braun, and G.C. Polyzos, "A parameterizable methodology for intemet traffic flow profiling," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, pp. 1481 - 1494, Oct. 1995.
 
4
M. Mathis, J. Mahdavi, S. Floyd, and A. Romanow, "TCP Selective Acknowledgement Options," Request for Comments RFC 2018, Internet Engineering Task Force, Oct. 1996.
 
5
V. Jacobson, R. Braden, and D. Borman, "TCP Extensions for High Performance," Request for Comments RFC 1323, Internet Engineering Task Force, May 1992.
 
6
J. Postel, "Transmission Control Protocol," Request for Comments RFC 793, Internet Engineering Task Force, Sept. 198 1.
 
7
J. Postel, "Internet Protocol," Request for Comments RFC 791, Internet Engineering Task Force, Sept. 1981.
 
8
I. Postel, "User Datagram Protocol," Request for Comments RFC 768, Internet Engineering Task Force, Aug. 1980.
 
9
 
10
R. Rivest, "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm," Request for Comments RFC 132 1, Internet Engineering Task Force, Apr. 1992.
 
11
P. Ferguson and D. Senie, "Network Ingress Filtering: Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source Address Spoofing," Request for Comments RFC 2827, Internet Engineering Task Force, May 2000.
 
12
"The dag project," On web, http://dag.cs.waikato.ac.nz, Referred2001-06-26.
 
13
Technical Committee, "LAN emulation over ATM version 2.0 LUNI specification," Tech. Rep. af-lane-0084.000, The ATM Forum, July 1997.

CITED BY  9