ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the marginal utility of network topology measurements
Full text PdfPdf (2.40 MB)
Source Internet Measurement Conference archive
Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet Measurement table of contents
San Francisco, California, USA
Session: Topology and routing table of contents
Pages: 5 - 17  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-435-5
Authors
Paul Barford  University of Wisconsin, Madison
Azer Bestavros  Boston University, Boston, MA
John Byers  Boston University, Boston, MA
Mark Crovella  Boston University, Boston, MA
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 61,   Citation Count: 24
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/505202.505204
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The cost and complexity of deploying measurement infrastructure in the Internet for the purpose of analyzing its structure and behavior is considerable. Basic questions about the utility of increasing the number of measurements and measurement sites have not yet been addressed which has led to a "more is better" approach to wide-area ,measurement studies. In this paper, we step toward a more quantifiable understanding of the marginal utility of performing wide-area ,measurements in the context of Internet topology discovery. We characterize the observable topology in terms of nodes, links, node degree distribution, and distribution of end-to-end flows using statistical and information-theoretic techniques. We classify nodes discovered on the routes between a set of 8 sources and 1277 destinations to differentiate nodes which make up the so called "backbone" from those which border the backbone and those on links between the border nodes and destination nodes. This process includes reducing nodes that advertise multiple interfaces to single IP addresses. We show that the utility of adding sources beyond the second source quickly diminishes from the perspective of interface, node, link and node degree discovery. We also show that the utility of adding destinations is constant for interfaces, nodes, links and node degree indicating that it is more important to add destinations than sources.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
N. Abramson. Information Theory and Coding. McGraw-Hill, 1963.
 
2
A. Adams, J. Mahdavi, M. Mathis, and V. Paxson. Creating a Scalable Architecture for Internet Measurement. In Proceedings of INET '98, 1998.
3
 
4
H-W Braun and KC. Claffy. Global ISP interconnectivity by AS number. http://moat.nlanr.net/AS/.
 
5
A. Broido and K. Claffy. Connectivity of IP Graphs. In Proceedings of SPIE ITCom '01, Scalability and Traffic Control in IP Networks, August 2001.
 
6
H. Chang, S. Jamin, and W. Willinger. On Inferring AS- Level Connectivity from BGP Routing Tables. Available at http://topology.eecs.umich.edu/archive/igp.ps.
 
7
H. Chang, S. Jamin, and W. Willinger. Inferring AS-level Internet Topology from Router-level Traceroutes. In Proceedings of SPIE ITCom '01, Scalability and Traffic Control in IP Networks, August 2001.
 
8
B. Cheswick. Internet mapping project. http://www.cs.belllabs.comlwho/ches/map/.
 
9
J. Chuang and M. Sirbu. Pricing multicast communication: A cost-based approach. In Proceedings of INET '98, 1998.
10
 
11
Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis (CAIDA). The Skitter project. http://www.caida.orglIbols/Skitter.
 
12
P. Francis, S. Jamin, V. Paxson, L. Zhang, D. Gryniewicz, and Y. Jin. An Architecture for a Global Host Distance Estimation Service. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '99, March 1999.
 
13
 
14
R. Govindan and H. Tangmunarunkit. Heuristics for Internet Map Discovery. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '00, April 2000.
 
15
16
 
17
V. Jacobson. traceroute. ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/traceroute.tar.Z, 1989.
 
18
S. Jamin, C. Jin, Y. Jin, D. Raz, Y. Shavitt, and L. Zhang. On the Placement of Internet Instrumentation. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2000, March 2000.
19
20
 
21
 
22
23
 
24
The SCAN Project. http:/iwww.isi.edu/scani.
 
25
The Surveyor Project. http:Nwww.advanced.org/, 1998.
 
26
Internet Traffic Report. http:Nwww.intemettrafficreport.com/.
 
27
The Internet Weather Report. http://www3.mids.org/weather/index.html, 2000.
28
 
29
C. Shannon. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 47:143-157, 1948.
 
30
 
31
R. Siamwalla, R. Sharma, and S. Keshav. Discovering Internet Topology. Technical report, Cornell University Computer Science Department, July 1998. http://www.cs.cornell.edu/skeshav/papers/discovery.pdf.
 
32
H. Tangmunamnkit, R. Govindan, S. Shenker, and D. Estrin. The Impact of Policy on Internet Paths. In Proceedings of IEEE IN- FOCOM '01, April 2001.
 
33

CITED BY  24

Collaborative Colleagues:
Paul Barford: colleagues
Azer Bestavros: colleagues
John Byers: colleagues
Mark Crovella: colleagues