|
ABSTRACT
In this paper we discuss the nature of our overall enterprise to
create ontologies in the product and service knowledge space for
Business-to-Business (B2B) electronic commerce. We describe one
crucial problem: the mapping problem, i.e., mapping among
ontologies, taxonomies, and classification systems, some of which
are more semantically sound and coherent than others. This problem
we consider to be in need of a sustained research program if
tenable solutions are to be found, since the lack of a solution
will preclude widespread adoption of ontologies by the commercial
world. Finally, we summarize the general issues we faced and
indicate prospective future research.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
P. Blair, R. V. Guha, and W. Pratt. Microtheories: An ontological engineer's guide. Technical Report Cyc-050-92, Cycorp, Austin, TX, 1992.
|
| |
2
|
V. Chaudri, A. Farquhar, R. Fikes, P. D. Karp, and J. P. Rice. Open knowledge base connectivity specification. Specification V. 2.0.31, SRI and Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, 1998.
|
| |
3
|
M. Femandez, A. Gomez-Perez, and N. Juristo. METHONTOLOGY: From ontological art to ontological engineering. In Workshop on Ontological Engineering. AAAI Spring Symposium, Stanford, University, 1997.
|
| |
4
|
F. Giunchiglia and C. Ghidini. Local models semantics, or contextual reasoning = locality + compatibility. In Proc. of the 6th Zntl. Conz on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'98), pages 282-289, Trento, Italy, 1998.
|
| |
5
|
N. Guarino and C. Welty. Towards a methodology for ontology based model engineering, 2000. http://www.ladseb.pd.cm.it/infor/ontology/ontology.html.
|
| |
6
|
R.V. Guha and D. Lenat. Cyc: A mid-term report. Microelectronics Technology and Computer Corporation (MCC), Austin, TX, Technical Report ACT-CYC-134-90, 1990.
|
| |
7
|
D. M. Jones, T. Bench-Capon, and P. Visser. Methodologies for ontology development. In, Proc. ITi and KNOWS Conf of the 15th IFIP World Computer Congress, pages 62-75, London, UK, 1998. Chapman and Hall Ltd.
|
| |
8
|
P. D. Karp, V.K. Chaudhri, J. Thomere. XOL: An XML-based ontology exchange language. Pangaea Systems and SRI, International, 1999. http://www.ai.sri.com/-pkarp/xol/.
|
| |
9
|
D. L. McGuinness, R. Fikes, J. Rice, and S. Wilder. An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In Proc. of the 7th Intl. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2000), Breckenridge, Colorado, USA, Apr. 2000. Morgan Kaufmann.
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
CITED BY 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Hepp , Joerg Leukel , Volker Schmitz, A quantitative analysis of product categorization standards: content, coverage, and maintenance of eCl@ss, UNSPSC, eOTD, and the RosettaNet Technical Dictionary, Knowledge and Information Systems, v.13 n.1, p.77-114, September 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
K.
Computing Milieux
K.4
COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
K.4.4
Electronic Commerce
Additional Classification:
I.
Computing Methodologies
I.2
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
I.2.4
Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods
Subjects:
Predicate logic;
Semantic networks;
Representations (procedural and rule-based);
Representation languages
General Terms:
Algorithms,
Design,
Economics,
Experimentation,
Languages,
Management,
Performance,
Reliability,
Standardization,
Theory
Keywords:
B2B e-commerce,
business-to-business electronic commerce,
ontological engineering,
ontology management,
ontology mapping,
ontology merging
|