ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Ontological engineering for B2B E-commerce
Full text PdfPdf (2.64 MB)
Source Formal Ontology in Information Systems archive
Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001 table of contents
Ogunquit, Maine, USA
Pages: 117 - 126  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-377-4
Authors
Leo Obrst  The MITRE Corp., McLean, VA
Robert E. Wray  ACM
Howard Liu  Sacramento, CA
Sponsor
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 76,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/505168.505180
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we discuss the nature of our overall enterprise to create ontologies in the product and service knowledge space for Business-to-Business (B2B) electronic commerce. We describe one crucial problem: the mapping problem, i.e., mapping among ontologies, taxonomies, and classification systems, some of which are more semantically sound and coherent than others. This problem we consider to be in need of a sustained research program if tenable solutions are to be found, since the lack of a solution will preclude widespread adoption of ontologies by the commercial world. Finally, we summarize the general issues we faced and indicate prospective future research.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. Blair, R. V. Guha, and W. Pratt. Microtheories: An ontological engineer's guide. Technical Report Cyc-050-92, Cycorp, Austin, TX, 1992.
 
2
V. Chaudri, A. Farquhar, R. Fikes, P. D. Karp, and J. P. Rice. Open knowledge base connectivity specification. Specification V. 2.0.31, SRI and Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, 1998.
 
3
M. Femandez, A. Gomez-Perez, and N. Juristo. METHONTOLOGY: From ontological art to ontological engineering. In Workshop on Ontological Engineering. AAAI Spring Symposium, Stanford, University, 1997.
 
4
F. Giunchiglia and C. Ghidini. Local models semantics, or contextual reasoning = locality + compatibility. In Proc. of the 6th Zntl. Conz on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'98), pages 282-289, Trento, Italy, 1998.
 
5
N. Guarino and C. Welty. Towards a methodology for ontology based model engineering, 2000. http://www.ladseb.pd.cm.it/infor/ontology/ontology.html.
 
6
R.V. Guha and D. Lenat. Cyc: A mid-term report. Microelectronics Technology and Computer Corporation (MCC), Austin, TX, Technical Report ACT-CYC-134-90, 1990.
 
7
D. M. Jones, T. Bench-Capon, and P. Visser. Methodologies for ontology development. In, Proc. ITi and KNOWS Conf of the 15th IFIP World Computer Congress, pages 62-75, London, UK, 1998. Chapman and Hall Ltd.
 
8
P. D. Karp, V.K. Chaudhri, J. Thomere. XOL: An XML-based ontology exchange language. Pangaea Systems and SRI, International, 1999. http://www.ai.sri.com/-pkarp/xol/.
 
9
D. L. McGuinness, R. Fikes, J. Rice, and S. Wilder. An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In Proc. of the 7th Intl. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2000), Breckenridge, Colorado, USA, Apr. 2000. Morgan Kaufmann.
 
10
 
11

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Leo Obrst: colleagues
Robert E. Wray: colleagues
Howard Liu: colleagues