ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The design response to usability test findings: a case study based on artifacts and interviews
Full text PdfPdf (511 KB)
Source ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communication archive
Proceedings of IEEE professional communication society international professional communication conference and Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM international conference on Computer documentation: technology & teamwork table of contents
Cambridge, Massachusetts
SESSION: Models for effective testing table of contents
Pages: 315 - 323  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:0-7803-6431-7
Authors
Marcia A. Ruthford  Attachmate Corporation, Bellevue, WA
Judith A. Ramey  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Sponsors
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
IEEE-IPCC : IEEE-IPCC
Publisher
IEEE Educational Activities Department  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Usability testing during product development has gained wide acceptance as a strategy for improving product quality. But it is difficult to find published studies that actually document the impact of usability test findings and recommendations on product design. This case study examines a usability test that was done during the development of a software feature and is based on the usability test artifacts and interviews with people who were involved in designing, developing, and implementing the software feature. We attempt to determine if and how the recommended changes from the usability test were implemented, to identify other changes made to the feature being designed, and to determine the source of those other changes. Based on our findings in this case study, we can say that the usability test findings and recommendations had a great impact on the design of the feature, and the design was also influenced by seven other sources.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Schellens, P.J., and M. de Jong. "Revision of Public Information Brochures on the Basis of Reader Feedback." Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 11:443-461, 1997.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Marcia A. Ruthford: colleagues
Judith A. Ramey: colleagues