ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Job performance evaluation of data processing personnel: an empirical study
Full text PdfPdf (209 KB)
Source ACM Southeast Regional Conference archive
Proceedings of the 18th annual Southeast regional conference table of contents
Tallahassee, Florida
SESSION: General topics in computer science II - GCS II table of contents
Pages: 185 - 188  
Year of Publication: 1980
ISBN:0-89791-014-1
Author
Charles K. Woodruff  University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 11,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/503838.503878
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Job performance evaluations of 16 systems analysts, 52 programmer analysts, 63 programmers, and 71 operations personnel from twelve data processing centers in metropolitan Atlanta are presented. Judgmental ratings of eight job characteristic traits by the individual's manager or supervisor were used. Study subjects were rated highest in Cooperation and lowest in Innovativeness. Systems analysts were rated highest of the functional groups.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Erikson, W. J. A Pilot StudX of Interactive Versus Noninteractive Debugging. Santa Monica, California: System Development Corporation, 1966.
 
2
Grant, E. E., and Sackman, H. An Exploratory Investigation of Programmer Performance Under 0n-Line and Off-Line Conditions. Santa Monies, California: System Development Corporation, 1966.
 
3
Katz, Daniel. "The Motivational Basis of Organizational Behavior." Behavioral Science 9 (1964): 131-46.
4
 
5