A survey of user-centered design practice

ABSTRACT

This paper reports the results of a recent survey of user-centered design (UCD) practitioners. The survey involved over a hundred respondents who were CHI'2000 attendees or current UPA members. The paper identifies the most widely used methods and processes, the key factors that predict success, and the critical tradeoffs practitioners must make in applying UCD methods and processes. Results show that cost-benefit tradeoffs are a key consideration in the adoption of UCD methods. Measures of UCD effectiveness are lacking and rarely applied. There is also a major discrepancy between the commonly cited measures and the actually applied ones. These results have implications for the introduction, deployment, and execution of UCD projects

REFERENCES

• 1: Bill Curtis , Herb Krasner , Neil Iscoe, A field study of the software design process for large systems, Communications of the ACM, v.31 n.11, p.1268-1287, Nov. 1988 [doi>10.1145/50087.50089]
• 2: John D. Gould , Stephen J. Boies , Clayton Lewis, Making usable, useful, productivity-enhancing computer applications, Communications of the ACM, v.34 n.1, p.74-85, Jan. 1991 [doi>10.1145/99977.99993]
• 3: Gunther, R., Janis, J., & Butler, S., The UCD Decision Matrix: How, When, and Where to Sell User-Centered Design into the Development Cycle, http://www.ovostudios.com/upa2001/, accessed on June 29, 2001.
• 4: Hudson, W., User-Centered Survey Results, email posting to [e-mail], May 3, 2000.
• 5: Jakob Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1993
• 6: Jakob Nielsen, Guerrilla HCI: using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier, Cost-justifying usability, Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL, 1994
• 7: Donald A. Norman , Stephen W. Draper, User Centered System Design; New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1986
• 8: Stephanie Rosenbaum , Janice Anne Rohn , Judee Humburg, A toolkit for strategic usability: results from workshops, panels, and surveys, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.337-344, April 01-06, 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/332040.332454]
• 9: Vredenburg, K., & Butler, M. B., Current Practice and Future Directions in User-Centered Design. Usability Professionals' Association Fifth Annual Conference, Copper Mountain, Colorado, 1996.
• 10: Karel Vredenburg, Increasing ease of use, Communications of the ACM, v.42 n.5, p.67-71, May 1999 [doi>10.1145/301353.301419]
• 11: Karel Vredenberg , Scott Isensee , Carol Righi, User-Centered Design: An Integrated Approach with Cdrom, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: User-centered design

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: User interfaces

  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human factors

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
HCI professionals, methodology, organizational impact, usability engineering, user-centered design