ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
"I'd be overwhelmed, but it's just one more thing to do": availability and interruption in research management
Full text PdfPdf (614 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves table of contents
Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
SESSION: Structure and Flow table of contents
Pages: 97 - 104  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-453-3
Authors
James M. Hudson  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Jim Christensen  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, NY
Wendy A. Kellogg  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, NY
Thomas Erickson  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, NY
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 26,   Downloads (12 Months): 197,   Citation Count: 63
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/503376.503394
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many CSCW projects dealing with individual availability and interruption filtering achieve only limited success. Perhaps this is because designers of such systems have limited evidence to draw upon; most data on interruption management is at least a decade old. This study uses an empirical sampling method and qualitative interviews to examine attitudes toward availability and interruption. Specifically, we analyze how corporate research managers spend their time and look at how their attitudes toward interruption relate to their various activities. Attitudes toward interruption are marked by a complex tension between wanting to avoid interruption and appreciating its usefulness. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for design, suggesting that the notion of socially translucent systems may be a fruitful approach


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ackerman, M. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15 (2--3). 181--205.
 
2
Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A. and Carlis, J.V. The Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance, Annoyance, and Anxiety in the User Interface. in Proceedings of INTERACT 2001, NCP, Tokyo, Japan, 2001.
 
3
Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A. and Carlis, J.V. Measuring the Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance in the User Interface. in IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 2000, IEEE, Nashville, TN, 2000, 757--762.
 
4
Cohen, D. and Prusak, L. In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2001.
 
5
Cohen, M.D. and March, J.G. Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1974.
 
6
Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M. and Horvitz, E. Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance. in Interact 2001 Conference Proceedings, Tokyo, Japan, 2001.
 
7
Davenport, T.H. and Beck, J.C. The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001.
 
8
Derber, C. The Pursuit of Attention: Power and Ego in Everyday Life (Second Edition). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1979, 2000.
9
 
10
Hall, E.T. The Silent Language. Anchor Books, New York, NY, 1959, 1981.
11
 
12
Kubey, R.W. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. Television and the Quality of Life: How Viewing Shapes Everyday Experience. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1990.
 
13
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.
 
14
McFarlane, D.C. Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction. in Sasse, A. and Johnson, C. eds. Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT'99), IOS Press, 1999, 295--303.
15
16
 
17
Olson, G.M. and Olson, J.S. Distance Matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15 (2&3). 139--178.
 
18
Panko, R.R. Managerial Communication Patterns. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2 (1). 95--122.
19
 
20
Sproull, L.S. The Nature of Managerial Attention. in Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, JAI Press, 1984, 9--27.
 
21
Sproull, L.S. The Nature of Managerial Attention. Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, 1. 9--27.
 
22
Tannen, D. Gender Differences in Conversational Coherence: Physical Alignment and Topical Cohesion. in Tannen, D. ed. Gender and Discourse, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1994, 85--135.
 
23
Tannen, D. That's Not What I Meant! How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks your Relations with Others. William Morrow and Co., New York, NY, 1986.
 
24
Tannen, D. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. William Morrow and Co., New York, NY, 1990.

CITED BY  63

Collaborative Colleagues:
James M. Hudson: colleagues
Jim Christensen: colleagues
Wendy A. Kellogg: colleagues
Thomas Erickson: colleagues