ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Themometers and themostats: characterizing and controlling thematic attributes of information
Full text PdfPdf (100 KB)
Source International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces archive
Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces table of contents
San Francisco, California, USA
SESSION: Short Papers table of contents
Pages: 196 - 197  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-459-2
Authors
Marko Krema  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Larry Birnbaum  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Jay Budzik  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Kristian J. Hammond  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 12,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/502716.502754
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Contents of documents can be characterized not just by subject matter or topic, but also in terms of more thematic or even stylistic attributes, such as level of detail, emotional vs. unemotional presentation, personal vs. impersonal voice, positive or negative attitude or "spin," theoretical vs. practical presentation, etc. As implied by these examples, such attributes often form continuous dimensions along which documents can be distinguished. In the best case, the appropriate place on these dimensions -- i.e., which documents will be of most value to the user at the current time -- can be determined by the user's current task, prior knowledge, etc. Does the user need more detail, or less, for example? In the current state of the art, it is difficult to compute this automatically. Instead, we propose that users should be enabled view these dimensions using themometers and to navigate them using themostats -- controls that offer users a choice of documents on the same topic, but with differing levels of detail, positive or negative spin, personal or impersonal voice, etc. The dimensions along which we can provide this kind of control must be easily computable. We have been able to characterize documents with respect to a number of these dimensions using simple statistical measures as well as specialized dictionaries, and describe these methods herein.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Budzik, J and Hammond, K. Watson: Anticipating and contextualizing information needs. 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Medford, NJ, 1999.
 
2
Birnbaum L., Argument Molecules: A Functional Representation of Argument Structure. Proceedings of the AAAI'82 pp 63-65.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Marko Krema: colleagues
Larry Birnbaum: colleagues
Jay Budzik: colleagues
Kristian J. Hammond: colleagues