ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Measuring task models in designing intelligent products
Full text PdfPdf (134 KB)
Source International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces archive
Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces table of contents
San Francisco, California, USA
SESSION: Short Papers table of contents
Pages: 188 - 189  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-459-2
Authors
Elyon DeKoven  Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
David V. Keyson  Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 18,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/502716.502750
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

As part of a design process, designers may create a model of user tasks. If the task model were to be built into an intelligent product's reasoning capabilities, the product could provide timely assistance specific to the user's current tasks. Thus for both the design and the intelligence of the product, the more accurate the task model, the more likely such a product may fit the users' needs. In the current paper we describe a new approach for evaluating the usability of intelligent products, based on information available in the designer's task model. This measure is then used to determine the degree to which users are able to access the task support provided by the product, and to identify users' needs for additional assistance. In this way, the usability measures presented in this paper can contribute to an iterative user-centered design process for designing and building product intelligence.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Annett, J. and Duncan, K.D. (1967). Task Analysis and Training Design. Occupational Psychology, 41, 211-221.
2
 
3

Collaborative Colleagues:
Elyon DeKoven: colleagues
David V. Keyson: colleagues