ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Getting to know you: learning new user preferences in recommender systems
Full text PdfPdf (295 KB)
Source International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces archive
Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces table of contents
San Francisco, California, USA
SESSION: Full Papers table of contents
Pages: 127 - 134  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-459-2
Authors
Al Mamunur Rashid  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Istvan Albert  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Dan Cosley  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Shyong K. Lam  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Sean M. McNee  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Joseph A. Konstan  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
John Riedl  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 131,   Citation Count: 32
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/502716.502737
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Recommender systems have become valuable resources for users seeking intelligent ways to search through the enormous volume of information available to them. One crucial unsolved problem for recommender systems is how best to learn about a new user. In this paper we study six techniques that collaborative filtering recommender systems can use to learn about new users. These techniques select a sequence of items for the collaborative filtering system to present to each new user for rating. The techniques include the use of information theory to select the items that will give the most value to the recommender system, aggregate statistics to select the items the user is most likely to have an opinion about, balanced techniques that seek to maximize the expected number of bits learned per presented item, and personalized techniques that predict which items a user will have an opinion about. We study the techniques thru offline experiments with a large pre-existing user data set, and thru a live experiment with over 300 users. We show that the choice of learning technique significantly affects the user experience, in both the user effort and the accuracy of the resulting predictions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Avery, C., Resnick, P., and Zeckhauser, R. The Market for Evaluations. American Economic Review, 89(3): 564-584.
2
 
3
Ben-Bassat, M. Myopic Policies in Sequential Classification. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 27(2), 170-174.
4
 
5
 
6
7
 
8
Ha, V., and Haddawy P. Towards Case-Based Preference Elicitation: Similarity Measures on Preference Structures. Proceedings UAI 1998, 193-201.
 
9
Horvitz, E., Heckerman D., Ng, K, Nathwani, B. Towards Normative Expert Systems: Part I, Pathfinder Project. Methods of Information in Medicine, 31, 90- 105.
10
11
 
12
Kohrs, A., and Merialdo, B. Improving Collaborative Filtering for New Users by Smart Object Selection, Proceedings of International Conference on Media Features (ICMF) 2001 (oral presentation).
 
13
Nguyen, H., and Haddawy, P. The Decision-Theoretic Video Advisor. Proceedings of AAAI Workshop on Recommender Systems, 76-80, 1998.
 
14
 
15
 
16
Vetschera, R. Entropy and the Value of Information, Central European Journal of Operations Research 8, 2000 S. 195-208.
17

CITED BY  32

Collaborative Colleagues:
Al Mamunur Rashid: colleagues
Istvan Albert: colleagues
Dan Cosley: colleagues
Shyong K. Lam: colleagues
Sean M. McNee: colleagues
Joseph A. Konstan: colleagues
John Riedl: colleagues