ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluating document clustering for interactive information retrieval
Full text PdfPdf (2.08 MB)
Source Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management table of contents
Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Session: Clustering table of contents
Pages: 33 - 40  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-436-3
Author
Anton Leuski  University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
Sponsors
SIGMIS: ACM Special Interest Group on Management Information Systems
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 102,   Citation Count: 27
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/502585.502592
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider the problem of organizing and browsing the top ranked portion of the documents returned by an information retrieval system. We study the effectiveness of a document organization in helping a user to locate the relevant material among the retrieved documents as quickly as possible. In this context we examine a set of clustering algorithms and experimentally show that a clustering of the retrieved documents can be significantly more effective than traditional ranked list approach. We also show that the clustering approach can be as effective as the interactive relevance feedback based on query expansion while retaining an important advantage -- it provides the user with a valuable sense of control over the feedback process.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
J. Allan, J. Callan, W. B. Croft, L. Ballesteros, D. Byrd, R. Swan, and J. Xu. Inquery does battle with TREG6. In Sixth Tat REtrievol Conference (TREC-G), pages 16(t206, 1998.
 
4
A. Bookstein. Information retrieval: A sequential learning process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(5):331-342, 1983.
 
5
W. B. Croft. OrganGing and Searching Large Files of Documents. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, October 1978.
 
6
7
8
 
9
Google. http://VVV.gOOglB.com/.
 
10
D. Harman and E. Voorheq editors. The Sh Tat REtvial Conference (TREC-6). NIST, 1998.
11
12
13
 
14
G. N. Lance and W. T. Williams. A general theory of classificatory sorting strategies: 1. hierarchical systems. Computer Journal, 9:373-380, 1967.
15
 
16
 
17
A. Leuski and J. Allan. Evaluating a visual navigation system for a digital library. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 3(2):170--184, 2000.
 
18
A. Leuski and J. Allan. Improving interactive retrieval by combining ranked lists and clustering. In Proceedings of RIAO'2000, pages 6655681, April 2000.
 
19
A. Leuski and W. B. Croft. An evaluation of techniques for clustering search results. Technical Report IR-76, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1996.
20
 
21
B. Mirkin. Mathematical Classification and Clustering. Kluwer, 1996.
 
22
Northern light. http: //www. northernlight. corn/.
 
23
S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, S. Jones, M. M. Hancock-Beaulieu, and M. Gatford. Okapi at TRECS. In D. Harman and E. Voorhees, editors, Third Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-3). NIST, 1995.
 
24
25
 
26
27
 
28
29

CITED BY  27