ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Discovering the set of fundamental rule changes
Full text PdfPdf (572 KB)
Source International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining table of contents
San Francisco, California
Pages: 335 - 340  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-391-X
Authors
Bing Liu  National University of Singapore, Singapore
Wynne Hsu  National University of Singapore, Singapore
Yiming Ma  National University of Singapore, Singapore
Sponsors
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
AAAI : American Association for Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 42,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/502512.502561
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The world around us changes constantly. Knowing what has changed is an important part of our lives. For businesses, recognizing changes is also crucial. It allows businesses to adapt themselves to the changing market needs. In this paper, we study changes of association rules from one time period to another. One approach is to compare the supports and/or confidences of each rule in the two time periods and report the differences. This technique, however, is too simplistic as it tends to report a huge number of rule changes, and many of them are, in fact, simply the snowball effect of a small subset of fundamental changes. Here, we present a technique to highlight the small subset of fundamental changes. A change is fundamental if it cannot be explained by some other changes. The proposed technique has been applied to a number of real-life datasets. Experiments results show that the number of rules whose changes are unexplainable is quite small (about 20% of the total number of changes discovered), and many of these unexplainable changes reflect some fundamental shifts in the application domain.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Agrawal, R. and Psaila, G. "Active data mining." KDD-95.
 
2
 
3
Bayardo, R., Agrawal, R, and Gunopulos, D. "Constraintbased rule mining in large, dense databases." ICDE-99, 1999.
 
4
5
 
6
Ester, M., Frommelt, A., Kriegel, H-P., and Sander, J. "Algorithms for characterization and trend detection in spatial databases." KDD-98, 1998.
 
7
Fayyad, U. M. and Irani, K. B. "Multi-interval discretization of continuous-valued attributes for classification learning." IJCAI-93, 1993.
8
 
9
Ganti, V., Gehrke, J., and Ramakrishnan, R. "DEMON: mining and monitoring evolving data." ICDE-2000, 2000.
 
10
 
11
Johnson T. and Dasu, T. "Comparing massive highdimensional data sets," KDD-98, 1998.
 
12
Kohavi, R., John, G., Long, R., Manley, D., and Pfleger, K. "MLC++: a machine learning library in C++." Tools with artificial intelligence, 740-743, 1994.
 
13
Lane, T. and Brodley, C. "Approaches to online learning and concept drift for user identification in computer security." KDD-98, 1998.
 
14
Liu, B., Hsu, W., and Chen, S. "Using general impressions to analyze discovered classification rules." KDD-97, 1997.
 
15
Liu, B., Hsu, W. and Ma, Y. Discovering the set of fundamental rule changes. NUS Technical Report, 2001.
16
 
17
Mann, P. Introductory statistics. John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
18
 
19
 
20

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Bing Liu: colleagues
Wynne Hsu: colleagues
Yiming Ma: colleagues