ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Extracting collective probabilistic forecasts from web games
Full text PdfPdf (842 KB)
Source International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining table of contents
San Francisco, California
Pages: 174 - 183  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-391-X
Authors
David M. Pennock  NEC Research Institute, Princeton, NJ
Steve Lawrence  NEC Research Institute, Princeton, NJ
Finn Årup Nielsen  Technical University of Denmark. DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
C. Lee Giles  Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Sponsors
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
AAAI : American Association for Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 71,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/502512.502537
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Game sites on the World Wide Web draw people from around the world with specialized interests, skills, and knowledge. Data from the games often reflects the players' expertise and will to win. We extract probabilistic forecasts from data obtained from three online games: the Hollywood Stock Exchange (HSX), the Foresight Exchange (FX), and the Formula One Pick Six (F1P6) competition. We find that all three yield accurate forecasts of uncertain future events. In particular, prices of so-called "movie stocks" on HSX are good indicators of actual box office returns. Prices of HSX securities in Oscar, Emmy, and Grammy awards correlate well with observed frequencies of winning. FX prices are reliable indicators of future developments in science and technology. Collective predictions from players in the F1 competition serve as good forecasts of true race outcomes. In some cases, forecasts induced from game data are more reliable than expert opinions. We argue that web games naturally attract well-informed and well-motivated players, and thus offer a valuable and oft-overlooked source of high-quality data with significant predictive value.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. M. All. Probability and utility estimates for racetrack bettors. Journal of Political Economy, 85(4):803-816, 1977.
2
 
3
R. T. Clemen. Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Forecasting, 5:559-583, 1989.
4
 
5
Weighted least sum of squares regression. In C. Croarkin, P. Tobias, and W. Guthrie, editors, NIST/SEMATECH Engineering Statistics Internet Handbook. http ://www. itl. nist. gov/div898/handbook/pmd/ section1/pmd143, him.
 
6
B. de Finetti. Theory of Probability: A Critical Introductory Treatment, volume 1. Wiley, New York, 1974.
 
7
T. G. Dietterich. Machine learning research: Four current directions. Artificial Intelligence Magazine, 18(4):97-136, 1997.
 
8
U. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, and P. Smyth. Knowledge discovery and data mining: Towards a unifying framework. In Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1996.
9
 
10
R. Forsythe and R. Lundholm. Information aggregation in an experimental market. Econometrica, 58(2):309-347, 1990.
 
11
R. Forsythe, F. Nelson, G. R. Neumann, and J. Wright. Anatomy of an experimental political stock market. American Economic Review, 82(5):1142-1161, 1992.
 
12
R. Forsythe, T. A. Rietz, and T. W. Ross. Wishes, expectations, and actions: A survey on price formation in election stock markets. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39:83-110, 1999.
 
13
S. French. Group consensus probability distributions: A critical survey. Bayesian Statistics, 2:183-202, 1985.
 
14
J. M. Gandar, W. H. Dare, C. R. Brown, and R. A. Zuber. Informed traders and price variations in the betting market for professional basketball games. Journal of Finance, LIII(1):385-401, 1998.
 
15
C. Genest and J. V. Zidek. Combining probability distributions: A critique and an annotated bibliography. Statistical Science, 1(1):114-148, 1986.
 
16
 
17
R. Hanson. Decision markets. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(3):16-19, 1999.
 
18
R. D. Hanson. Could gambling save science? Encouraging an honest consensus. Social Epistemology, 9(1):3-33, 1995.
 
19
20
 
21
D. S. McKay, E. K. G. Jr., K. L. Thomas-Keprta, H. Vali, C. S. Romanek, S. J. Clemett, X. D. F. Chillier, C. R. Maechling, and R. N. Zare. Search for past life on Mars: Possible relic biogenic activity in Martian meteorite alh84001. Science, 273:924-930, Aug. 1996.
 
22
D. M. Pennock, S. Lawrence, C. L. Giles, and F. /,. Nielsen. The power of play: Efficiency and forecast accuracy in web market games. Technical Report 2000-168, NEC Research Institute, 2000.
 
23
D. M. Pennock, S. Lawrence, C. L. Giles, and F. A. Nielsen. The real power of artificial markets. Science, 291:987-988, February 9 2001.
 
24
C. R. Plott. Markets as information gathering tools. Southern Economic Journal, 67(1):1-15, 2000.
 
25
C. R. Plott and S. Sunder. Efficiency of experimental security markets with insider information: An application of rational-expectations models. Journal of Political Economy, 90(4):663-98, 1982.
 
26
C. R. Plott and S. Sunder. Rational expectations and the aggregation of diverse information in laboratory security markets. Econometrica, 56(5):1085-1118, 1988.
 
27
C. R. Plott, J. Wit, and W. C. Yang. Parimutuel betting markets as information aggregation devices: experimental results. Technical Report Social Science Working Paper 986, California Institute of Technology, Apr. 1997.
 
28
29
 
30
R. N. Rosett. Gambling and rationality. Journal of Political Economy, 73(6):595-607, 1965.
 
31
B. J. Sherrick, P. Garcia, and V. Tirupattur. Recovering probabilistic information from options markets: Tests of distributional assumptions. Journal of Futures Markets, 16(5):545-560, 1996.
 
32
W. W. Snyder. Horse racing: testing the efficient markets model. Journal of Finance, 33(4):1109-1118, 1978.
 
33
R. H. Thaler and W. T. Ziemba. Anomalies: Parimutuel betting markets: Racetracks and lotteries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(2):161-174, 1988.
 
34
D. A. Wasserman. More than enough answers to questions nobody asked about F1Pick6, 1996. http ://www. freenet, edmonton, ab. ca/-davidwss/ flp6anal, pdf.
 
35
M. Weitzman. Utility analysis and group behavior: An empirical study. Journal of Political Economy, 73(1):18-26, 1965.
 
36
R. L. Winkler and A. H. Murphy. Good probability assessors. J. Applied Meteorology, 7:751-758, 1968.

CITED BY  9

Collaborative Colleagues:
David M. Pennock: colleagues
Steve Lawrence: colleagues
Finn Årup Nielsen: colleagues
C. Lee Giles: colleagues