ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Will UML 2.0 be agile or awkward?
Full text HtmlHtml (16 KB),  PdfPdf (73 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 45 ,  Issue 1  (January 2002) table of contents
Internet abuse in the workplace and Game engines in scientific research
COLUMN: Technical opinion table of contents
Pages: 107 - 110  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Cris Kobryn  Telelogic
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 56,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/502269.502306
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The UML sits at an architectural crossroad. Will UML 2.0 resolve the problems of UML 1.x or will it succumb to the dreaded second-language syndrome?


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Object Management Group. OMG UML 2.0 Infrastructure RFP, document ad/00-09-01. Sept. 2000.
 
3
Object Management Group. OMG UML 2.0 Superstructure RFP, document ad/00-09-02. Sept. 2000.
 
4
Object Management Group. OMG UML 2.0 OCL RFP, document ad/00-09-03. Sept. 2000.
 
5
Object Management Group. OMG UML 2.0 Diagram Interchange RFP, document ad/01- 02-09. Feb. 2001.