ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Building efficient wireless sensor networks with low-level naming
Full text PdfPdf (1.54 MB)
Source ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles archive
Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles table of contents
Banff, Alberta, Canada
SESSION: Networking table of contents
Pages: 146 - 159  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-389-8
Also published in ...
Authors
John Heidemann  USC/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA
Fabio Silva  USC/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA
Chalermek Intanagonwiwat  USC/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA
Ramesh Govindan  USC/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA
Deborah Estrin  USC/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA and University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Deepak Ganesan  USC/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA and University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Sponsor
SIGOPS: ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 179,   Citation Count: 94
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/502034.502049
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In most distributed systems, naming of nodes for low-level communication leverages topological location (such as node addresses) and is independent of any application. In this paper, we investigate an emerging class of distributed systems where low-level communication does not rely on network topological location. Rather, low-level communication is based on attributes that are external to the network topology and relevant to the application. When combined with dense deployment of nodes, this kind of named data enables in-network processing for data aggregation, collaborative signal processing, and similar problems. These approaches are essential for emerging applications such as sensor networks where resources such as bandwidth and energy are limited. This paper is the first description of the software architecture that supports named data and in-network processing in an operational, multi-application sensor-network. We show that approaches such as in-network aggregation and nested queries can significantly affect network traffic. In one experiment aggregation reduces traffic by up to 42% and nested queries reduce loss rates by 30%. Although aggregation has been previously studied in simulation, this paper demonstrates nested queries as another form of in-network processing, and it presents the first evaluation of these approaches over an operational testbed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
F. Bennett, D. Clarke, J. B. Evans, A. Hopper, A. Jones, and D. Leask. Piconet: Embedded mobile networking. IEEEPersonal Communications Magazine, 4(5):8-15, Oct. 1997.
4
 
5
6
7
 
8
9
 
10
CCITT. The directory: Overview of concepts, models and service. Recommendation X.500, CCITt, 1988.
11
 
12
 
13
D. Coffin, D. V. Hook, R. Govindan, J. Heidemarm, and F. Silva. Network Routing Application Programmer's Interface (API) and Walk Through. Mrr/LL and USC/ISI, Dec. 2000.
 
14
D.A. Coffin, D. J. V. Hook, S. M. McGarry, and S. R. Kolek. Declarative ad-hoe sensor networking. In Proceedings of the SPIE Integrated Command Environments Conference, San Diego, California, USA, July 2000. SPIE. (part of SPIE International Symposium on Optical Science and Technology).
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
V. Fuller, T. Li, J. Yu, and K. Varadhan. Classless inter-domain routing (CIDR): an address assignment and aggregation strategy. RFC 1519, Internet Request For Comments, Sept. 1993.
 
19
20
21
 
22
T. Imielinski and S. Goel. DataSpace: QueryIng and Monitoring Deeply Networked Collections in Physical Space. 1EEE Personal Communications. Special Issue on Smart Spaces and Environments, 7(5):4--9, October 2000..,
23
 
24
V. Jacobson. Compressing TCP/1P headers for low-speed serial finks. RFC 1144, Internet Request For Comments, Feb. 1990.
 
25
S. Michel, K. Nguyen, A. Rosenstein, L. Zhang, S. Floyd, and V. Jaeobson. Adaptive web caching: Towards a new global caching architecture. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Worm Wide Web Conference, Manchester, England, June 1998.
 
26
P. Moekapetris. Domain names--concepts and facilities. RFC 1034, Internet Request For Comments, Nov. 1987.
27
28
29
 
30
Y. Rekhter, P. Lothberg, R. I-linden, S. Deoring, and J. Postel. An IPv6 provider-based unieast address format. RFC 2073, Internet Request For Comments, Jan. 1997.
 
31
32
 
33
K. Sohrabi, J. Gao, V. Ailawadhi, and G. Pottie. A self-organizing sensor network. In Proceedings of the 37th Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Monticello, ill., USA, Sept. 1999.
 
34
D.L. Tennenhonse, J. M. Smith, W. D. Sincoskie, D. J. Wetherall, and G. J. Minden. A survey of active network research. IEEE Communications Magazine, 35(1):80-86, Jan. 1997.
35
 
36
37
 
38
W. Yeong, T. Howes, and S. Kille. Lightweight directory access protocol. RFC 1777, Internet Request For Comments, Mar. 1995.
 
39
Y. Yu, D. Estrin, and R. Govindan. Geographical and energy-aware routing for wireless sensor networks: A recursive data dissemination protocol. Work in Progress, Mar. 2001.
 
40
Y. Zhao, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. Residual energy scans for monitoring wireless sensor networks. Technical Report 01-745, May 2001.

CITED BY  94

Collaborative Colleagues:
John Heidemann: colleagues
Fabio Silva: colleagues
Chalermek Intanagonwiwat: colleagues
Ramesh Govindan: colleagues
Deborah Estrin: colleagues
Deepak Ganesan: colleagues