|
ABSTRACT
Formal models and security proofs are especially important for multisignatures: in contrast to threshold signatures, no precise definitions were ever provided for such schemes, and some proposals were subsequently broken.In this paper, we formalize and implement a variant of multi-signature schemes, Accountable-Subgroup Multisignatures (ASM). In essence, ASM schemes enable any subgroup, S, of a given group, G, of potential signers, to sign efficiently a message M so that the signature provably reveals the identities of the signers in S to any verifier.Specifically, we provide: - The first formal model of security for multisignature schemes that explicitly includes key generation (without relying on trusted third parties);
- A protocol, based on Schnorr's signature scheme [33], that is both provable and efficient:
- Only three rounds of communication are required per signature.
- The signing time per signer is the same as for the single-signer Schnorr scheme, regardless of the number of signers.
- The verification time is only slightly greater than that for the single-signer Schnorr scheme.
- The signature length is the same as for the single signer Schnorr scheme, regardless of the number of signers.
Our proof of security relies on random oracles and the hardness of the Discrete Log Problem.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Proceedin s of the Twentieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing ,Chicago,Illinois,2 -4 May 1988.
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
Michael Ben-Or , Shafi Goldwasser , Avi Wigderson, Completeness theorems for non-cryptographic fault-tolerant distributed computation, Proceedings of the twentieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, p.1-10, May 02-04, 1988, Chicago, Illinois, United States
[doi> 10.1145/62212.62213]
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
David Chaum , Claude Crépeau , Ivan Damgard, Multiparty unconditionally secure protocols, Proceedings of the twentieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, p.11-19, May 02-04, 1988, Chicago, Illinois, United States
[doi> 10.1145/62212.62214]
|
| |
8
|
D.Chaum and E.van Heyst.Group signatures.In
|
| |
9
|
D.W.Davies,editor.Advances in Cryptology -EUROCRYPT 91 ,volume 547 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science .Springer-Verlag, 8 -11 Apr.1991.
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
R.Gennaro,S.Jarecki,H.Krawczyk,and T.Rabin. Robust threshold DSS signatures.In {23 },pp.354 -371.
|
| |
15
|
R.Gennaro,S.Jarecki,H.Krawczyk,and T.Rabin. Secure distributed key generation for discrete-log based cryptosystems.In J.Stern,editor,Advances in Cryptology -EUROCRYPT '99 ,volume 1592 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science ,pages 295 -310. Springer-Verlag,2 -6 May 1999.
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
L.Harn.Group-oriented (t,n )threshold digital signature scheme and digital multisignature.IEE Proc.-Comput.Digit.Tech.,141(5),Sept.1994.
|
| |
18
|
P.Horster,M.Michels,and H.Petersen. Meta-multisignatures schemes based on the discrete logarithm problem.In Information Security:The Next Decade.Proceedin s of the IFIP TC11 Eleventh International Conference on Information Security, IFIP/Sec '95 ,pages 128 -141.Chapman &Hall,1995.
|
| |
19
|
K.Itakura and K.Nakamura.Apublic-key cryptosystem suitable for digital multisignatures.NEC Research &Development ,(71):1 -8,Oct.1983.
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
C.-M.Li,T.Hwang,and N.-Y.Lee. Threshold-multisignature schemes where suspected forgery mplies traceability of adversarial shareholders. In A.De Santis,editor,Advances in Cryptology -EUROCRYPT 94 ,volume 950 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science ,pages 194 -204. Springer-Verlag,1995,9 -12 May 1994.
|
| |
23
|
U.Maurer,editor.Advances in Cryptology -EUROCRYPT 96 ,volume 1070 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science .Springer-Verlag, 12 -16 May 1996.
|
| |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
K.Ohta and T.Okamoto.Multi-signature schemes secure against active nsider attacks.IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences , E82-A(1):21 -31,Jan.1999.
|
 |
30
|
|
| |
31
|
T.P.Pedersen.Athreshold cryptosystem without a trusted party (extended abstract).In Davies {9 },pages 522 -526.
|
| |
32
|
D.Pointcheval and J.Stern.Security proofs for signature schemes.In Maurer {23 },pages 387 -398.
|
| |
33
|
C.-P.Schnorr.E .cient signature generation by smart cards.Journal of Cryptology ,4(3):161-174,1991.
|
CITED BY 19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Giuseppe Ateniese , Susan Hohenberger, Proxy re-signatures: new definitions, algorithms, and applications, Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, November 07-11, 2005, Alexandria, VA, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Giuseppe Ateniese , Randal Burns , Reza Curtmola , Joseph Herring , Lea Kissner , Zachary Peterson , Dawn Song, Provable data possession at untrusted stores, Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, October 28-31, 2007, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alexandra Boldyreva , Craig Gentry , Adam O'Neill , Dae Hyun Yum, Ordered multisignatures and identity-based sequential aggregate signatures, with applications to secure routing, Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, October 28-31, 2007, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|