ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Accountable-subgroup multisignatures: extended abstract
Full text PdfPdf (306 KB)
Source Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security table of contents
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Session: Group Key Management and Signatures table of contents
Pages: 245 - 254  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-385-5
Authors
Silvio Micali  MIT, Cambridge, MA
Kazuo Ohta  The University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo, Japan
Leonid Reyzin  Boston University, Boston, MA
Sponsor
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 59,   Citation Count: 19
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/501983.502017
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Formal models and security proofs are especially important for multisignatures: in contrast to threshold signatures, no precise definitions were ever provided for such schemes, and some proposals were subsequently broken.In this paper, we formalize and implement a variant of multi-signature schemes, Accountable-Subgroup Multisignatures (ASM). In essence, ASM schemes enable any subgroup, S, of a given group, G, of potential signers, to sign efficiently a message M so that the signature provably reveals the identities of the signers in S to any verifier.Specifically, we provide:

  1. The first formal model of security for multisignature schemes that explicitly includes key generation (without relying on trusted third parties);
  2. A protocol, based on Schnorr's signature scheme [33], that is both provable and efficient:
    • Only three rounds of communication are required per signature.
    • The signing time per signer is the same as for the single-signer Schnorr scheme, regardless of the number of signers.
    • The verification time is only slightly greater than that for the single-signer Schnorr scheme.
    • The signature length is the same as for the single signer Schnorr scheme, regardless of the number of signers.
Our proof of security relies on random oracles and the hardness of the Discrete Log Problem.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Proceedin s of the Twentieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing ,Chicago,Illinois,2 -4 May 1988.
 
2
3
4
 
5
 
6
7
 
8
D.Chaum and E.van Heyst.Group signatures.In
 
9
D.W.Davies,editor.Advances in Cryptology -EUROCRYPT 91 ,volume 547 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science .Springer-Verlag, 8 -11 Apr.1991.
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
R.Gennaro,S.Jarecki,H.Krawczyk,and T.Rabin. Robust threshold DSS signatures.In {23 },pp.354 -371.
 
15
R.Gennaro,S.Jarecki,H.Krawczyk,and T.Rabin. Secure distributed key generation for discrete-log based cryptosystems.In J.Stern,editor,Advances in Cryptology -EUROCRYPT '99 ,volume 1592 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science ,pages 295 -310. Springer-Verlag,2 -6 May 1999.
16
 
17
L.Harn.Group-oriented (t,n )threshold digital signature scheme and digital multisignature.IEE Proc.-Comput.Digit.Tech.,141(5),Sept.1994.
 
18
P.Horster,M.Michels,and H.Petersen. Meta-multisignatures schemes based on the discrete logarithm problem.In Information Security:The Next Decade.Proceedin s of the IFIP TC11 Eleventh International Conference on Information Security, IFIP/Sec '95 ,pages 128 -141.Chapman &Hall,1995.
 
19
K.Itakura and K.Nakamura.Apublic-key cryptosystem suitable for digital multisignatures.NEC Research &Development ,(71):1 -8,Oct.1983.
 
20
 
21
 
22
C.-M.Li,T.Hwang,and N.-Y.Lee. Threshold-multisignature schemes where suspected forgery mplies traceability of adversarial shareholders. In A.De Santis,editor,Advances in Cryptology -EUROCRYPT 94 ,volume 950 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science ,pages 194 -204. Springer-Verlag,1995,9 -12 May 1994.
 
23
U.Maurer,editor.Advances in Cryptology -EUROCRYPT 96 ,volume 1070 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science .Springer-Verlag, 12 -16 May 1996.
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
K.Ohta and T.Okamoto.Multi-signature schemes secure against active nsider attacks.IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences , E82-A(1):21 -31,Jan.1999.
30
 
31
T.P.Pedersen.Athreshold cryptosystem without a trusted party (extended abstract).In Davies {9 },pages 522 -526.
 
32
D.Pointcheval and J.Stern.Security proofs for signature schemes.In Maurer {23 },pages 387 -398.
 
33
C.-P.Schnorr.E .cient signature generation by smart cards.Journal of Cryptology ,4(3):161-174,1991.

CITED BY  19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Silvio Micali: colleagues
Kazuo Ohta: colleagues
Leonid Reyzin: colleagues