| Events in security protocols |
| Full text |
Pdf
(269 KB)
|
| Source
|
Conference on Computer and Communications Security
archive
Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security
table of contents
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Session: Protocols
table of contents
Pages: 96 - 105
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-385-5
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 27, Citation Count: 10
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The events of a security protocol and their causal dependency can play an important role in the analysis of security properties. This insight underlies both strand spaces and the inductive method. But neither of these approaches builds up the events of a protocol in a compositional way, so that there is an informal spring from the protocol to its model. By broadening the models to certain kinds of Petri nets, a restricted form of contextual nets, a compositional event-based semantics is given to an economical, but expressive, language for describing security protocols; so the events and dependency of a wide range of protocols are determined once and for all. The net semantics is formally related to a transition semantics, strand spaces and inductive rules, as well as trace languages and event structures, so unifying a range of approaches, as well as providing conditions under which particular, more limited, models are adequate for the analysis of protocols. The net semantics allows the derivation of general properties and proof principles which are demonstrated in establishing an authentication property, following a diagrammatic style of proof.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
I.Cervesato,N.A.Durgin,M.Kanovich,and A.Scedrov.Interpreting strands in linear logic.In FMCS '00 ,2000.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
D.Dolev and A.C.Yao.On the security of public key protocols.IEEE Trans.on Inf.Theory ,2(29),1983.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
U.Montanari and F.Rossi.Contextual nets.Acta Informatica ,(32),1995.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
J.Thayer,J.Herzog,and J.Guttman.Strand spaces: Why is a security protocol correct?In 1998 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy .
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
CITED BY 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diletta Cacciagrano , Flavio Corradini , Jesús Aranda , Frank D. Valencia, Linearity, Persistence and Testing Semantics in the Asynchronous Pi-Calculus, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS), v.194 n.2, p.59-84, January, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|