| Delegation of cryptographic servers for capture-resilient devices |
| Full text |
Pdf
(313 KB)
|
| Source
|
Conference on Computer and Communications Security
archive
Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security
table of contents
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Session: Password Management and Digital Signatures
table of contents
Pages: 10 - 19
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-385-5
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 21, Citation Count: 3
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
A device that performs private key operations (signatures or decryptions), and whose private key operations are protected by a password, can be immunized against offline dictionary attacks in case of capture by forcing the device to confirm a password guess with a designated remote server in order to perform a private key operation. Recent proposals for achieving this allow untrusted servers and require no server initialization per device. In this paper we extend these proposals to enable dynamic delegation from one server to another; i.e., the device can subsequently use the second server to secure its private key operations. One application is to allow a user who is traveling to a foreign country to temporarily delegate to a server local to that country the ability to confirm password guesses and aid the user's device in performing private key operations, or in the limit, to temporarily delegate this ability to a token in the user's possession. Another application is proactive security for the device's private key, i.e., proactive updates to the device and servers to eliminate any threat of offline password guessing attacks due to previously compromised servers.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
M. Bellare and P. Rogaway. Optimal asymmetric encryption. In EUROCRYPT '94 (LNCS 950), pp. 92-111, 1995.
|
| |
4
|
M. Bellare and P. Rogaway. The exact security ofdigital signatures|How to sign with RSA and Rabin. In EUROCRYPT '96 (LNCS 1070), pp. 399-416, 1996.
|
| |
5
|
C. Boyd. Digital multisignatures. In H. J. Beker and F. C. Piper, editors, Cryptography and Coding, pp. 241-246. Clarendon Press, 1989.
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
Amir Herzberg , Markus Jakobsson , Stanislław Jarecki , Hugo Krawczyk , Moti Yung, Proactive public key and signature systems, Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, p.100-110, April 01-04, 1997, Zurich, Switzerland
[doi> 10.1145/266420.266442]
|
| |
11
|
D. N. Hoover and B. N. Kausik. Software smart cards via cryptographic camou age. In 1999 IEEE Symp. on Security and Privacy, pp. 208-215, 1999.
|
| |
12
|
D. Klein. Foiling the cracker: A survey of, and improvements to, password security. In 2 nd USENIX Security Workshop, Aug. 1990.
|
| |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
V. Shoup and R. Gennaro. Securing threshold cryptosystems against chosen ciphertext attack. In EUROCRYPT '98, pp. 1-16, 1998.
|
CITED BY 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Brainard , Ari Juels , Burt Kaliski , Michael Szydlo, A new two-server approach for authentication with short secrets, Proceedings of the 12th conference on USENIX Security Symposium, p.14-14, August 04-08, 2003, Washington, DC
|
|