ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Delegation of cryptographic servers for capture-resilient devices
Full text PdfPdf (313 KB)
Source Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security table of contents
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Session: Password Management and Digital Signatures table of contents
Pages: 10 - 19  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-385-5
Authors
Philip MacKenzie  Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies
Michael K. Reiter  Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies
Sponsor
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/501983.501986
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A device that performs private key operations (signatures or decryptions), and whose private key operations are protected by a password, can be immunized against offline dictionary attacks in case of capture by forcing the device to confirm a password guess with a designated remote server in order to perform a private key operation. Recent proposals for achieving this allow untrusted servers and require no server initialization per device. In this paper we extend these proposals to enable dynamic delegation from one server to another; i.e., the device can subsequently use the second server to secure its private key operations. One application is to allow a user who is traveling to a foreign country to temporarily delegate to a server local to that country the ability to confirm password guesses and aid the user's device in performing private key operations, or in the limit, to temporarily delegate this ability to a token in the user's possession. Another application is proactive security for the device's private key, i.e., proactive updates to the device and servers to eliminate any threat of offline password guessing attacks due to previously compromised servers.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
M. Bellare and P. Rogaway. Optimal asymmetric encryption. In EUROCRYPT '94 (LNCS 950), pp. 92-111, 1995.
 
4
M. Bellare and P. Rogaway. The exact security ofdigital signatures|How to sign with RSA and Rabin. In EUROCRYPT '96 (LNCS 1070), pp. 399-416, 1996.
 
5
C. Boyd. Digital multisignatures. In H. J. Beker and F. C. Piper, editors, Cryptography and Coding, pp. 241-246. Clarendon Press, 1989.
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
D. N. Hoover and B. N. Kausik. Software smart cards via cryptographic camou age. In 1999 IEEE Symp. on Security and Privacy, pp. 208-215, 1999.
 
12
D. Klein. Foiling the cracker: A survey of, and improvements to, password security. In 2 nd USENIX Security Workshop, Aug. 1990.
 
13
14
 
15
 
16
17
 
18
V. Shoup and R. Gennaro. Securing threshold cryptosystems against chosen ciphertext attack. In EUROCRYPT '98, pp. 1-16, 1998.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Philip MacKenzie: colleagues
Michael K. Reiter: colleagues