ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Comparison between graph-based and interference-based STDMA scheduling
Full text PdfPdf (127 KB)
Source International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing table of contents
Long Beach, CA, USA
Poster session: Poster abstracts table of contents
Pages: 255 - 258  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-428-2
Authors
Jimmi Grönkvist  Department of Communication Systems, Box 1165, SE-581 11 Linköping, Sweden
Anders Hansson  Department of Communication Systems, Box 1165, SE-581 11 Linköping, Sweden
Sponsor
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 141,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1145/501449.501453

ABSTRACT

Spatial reuse TDMA is a fixed assignment access scheme for multi-hop radio networks. The idea is to increase network capacity by letting several radio terminals use the same time slot when the interferences caused are not too severe. We consider two methods of generating traffic controlled reuse schedules. One method uses full knolwedge of the interference environment to generate schedules. The other method uses a graph representation of the network, assuming limited knowledge of the interferences. By simulations, we evaluate the proposed methods in terms of average delay and throughput. The simulation results indicate that the network performance of the graph-based scheduling may suffer compared to the interference-based scheduling, depending on how the graph is created. In a stationary situation, or temporary stationary situation, where knowledge of the full interference environment can be assumed, interference based scheduling can improve the network capacity by up to one thrid, thereby being worth its increased complexity


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
B. Asp, G. Eriksson, and P. Holm. Detvag-90 Final Report. Scientific Report FOA-R-97-00566-504-SE, Defence Research Est., Div. of Command and Control Warfare Tech. Linka oping, Sweden, Sept. 1997.
 
2
I. Chlamtac and A. Lerner. A link allocation protocol for mobile multi-hop radio networks. In GLOBECOM '85, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Conference Record, volume 1, pages 238-242, 1985.
 
3
 
4
N. Funabiki and Y. Takefuji. A parallel algorithm for broadcast scheduling problems in packet radio networks. IEEE Trans. Commun., 41(6):828-831, 1993.
 
5
J. Gr~onkvist. Traffic controlled spatial reuse TDMA for multihop radio networks. In Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, pages 1203-1207, 1998.
 
6
B. Hajek and G. Sasaki. Link scheduling in polynomial time. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory., 34(5):910-917, sept 1988.
 
7
R. Nelson and L. Kleinrock. Spatial-TDMA: A collision-free multihop channel access protocol. IEEE Trans. Commun., 33(9):934-944, Sept. 1985.
 
8
 
9
O. Somarriba. Multihop Packet Radio Systems in Rough Terrain. Tech.lic. thesis, Radio Communication Systems, Department of S3, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden, Oct. 1995.
 
10
J. Zander. Jamming in slotted ALOHA multihop packet radio networks. IEEE Trans. Commun., COM-39, Oct. 1991.

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jimmi Grönkvist: colleagues
Anders Hansson: colleagues