ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Effects of wireless physical layer modeling in mobile ad hoc networks
Full text PdfPdf (126 KB)
Source International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing table of contents
Long Beach, CA, USA
Session: Link and physical layer issues table of contents
Pages: 87 - 94  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-428-2
Authors
Mineo Takai  UCLA Computer Science Department, Los Angeles, CA
Jay Martin  UCLA Computer Science Department, Los Angeles, CA
Rajive Bagrodia  UCLA Computer Science Department, Los Angeles, CA
Sponsor
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 54,   Downloads (12 Months): 242,   Citation Count: 52
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1145/501426.501429

ABSTRACT

In most studies on mobile ad hoc networks (MANET), simulation models are used for the evaluation of devices and protocols. Typically, such simulations focus on the specific higher layer protocols that are being proposed, and tend to ignore details of models at other layers, particularly the interactions with physical layer models. In this paper, we present the set of factors at the physical layer that are relevant to the performance evaluations of higher layer protocols. Such factors include signal reception, path loss, fading, interference and noise computation, and preamble length. We start the discussion with the comparisions of physical layer models in ns-2 and GloMoSim, two commonly used simulators for MANET studies, and then quantify the impact of the preceding factors under typical scenarios used for the performance evaluation of wireless ad hoc routing protocols. Our experimental results show that the factors at the physical layer not only affect the absolute performance of a protocol, but because their impact on different protocols is non-uniform, it can even change the relative ranking among protocols for the same scenari


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Additions to the NS network simulator to handle Ricean and Rayleigh fading, http://www.ece.cmu.edu/wireless/.
 
2
 
3
Bajaj, L., Takai, M. et al., "Simulation of Large-Scale Heterogeneous Communication Systems," In proceedings of MILCOM'99, November 1999.
 
4
Das, S. R., Perkins, C. E. and Royer, E. M., "Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks," In Proceedings of INFOCOM 2000, March 2000.
 
5
GloMoSim, http://pcl.cs.ucla.edu/projects/glomosim/.
 
6
IEEE Standard 802.3, "Part 3: Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD), Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications," 2000 Edition.
 
7
IEEE Standard 802.11b-1999 (Supplement to ANSI/IEEE Standard 802.11, 1999 Edition).
 
8
International Standard ISO/IEC 8802-11: 1999(E), ANSI/IEEE Standard 802.11, 1999 Edition.
 
9
Johnson, D. and Maltz, D., "Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks," Mobile Computing, Chapter 5, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
 
10
Kamerman, A. and Monteban, L., "WaveLAN-II: a High- Performance Wireless LAN for the Unlicensed Band," Bell Labs Technical Journal, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 118 - 133, Summer 1997.
 
11
Network Simulator - ns-2, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.
 
12
OPNET Technologies, Inc., http://www.opnet.com/.
13
 
14
 
15
Punnoose, R. J., Nikitin, P. V. and Stancil, D. D., "Efficient Simulation of Ricean Fading within a Packet Simulator," In proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Conference, September 2000.
 
16
 
17
 
18
Wireless and Mobility Extensions to ns-2, http://www.monarch.cs.cmu.edu/cmu-ns.html.

CITED BY  54

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mineo Takai: colleagues
Jay Martin: colleagues
Rajive Bagrodia: colleagues