ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
High-performance bidding agents for the continuous double auction
Full text PdfPdf (138 KB)
Source Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce table of contents
Tampa, Florida, USA
Pages: 206 - 209  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-387-1
Authors
Gerald Tesauro  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, NY
Rajarshi Das  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, NY
Sponsor
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 58,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/501158.501183
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We develop two bidding algorithms for real-time Continuous Double Auctions (CDAs) using a variety of market rules that offer what we believe to be the strongest known performance of any published bidding strategy. Our algorithms are based on extensions of the "ZIP" (Cliff, 1997) and "GD" (Gjerstad and Dickhaut, 1998) strategies: we have made essential modifications to these strategies which enable trading multiple units in real-time markets. We test these strategies against each other and against the sniping strategy of (Rust et al., 1992) and the baseline "Zero Intelligence" strategy of (Gode and Sunder, 1992), using both a discrete-time simulator and a genuine real-time multi-agent environment called MAGENTA (Das et al., 2001). Under various market rules and limit price distributions, our modified Gjerstad-Dickhaut ("MGD") strategy outperforms the original GD, and generally ominates the other strategies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Andreoni and J. Miller. Auctions with artificial adaptive agents. Games and Economic Behavior', 10:3964, 1995.
 
2
D. Cliff. Minimal-intelligence agents for bargaining behaviors in market-based environments. Technical Report HPL-97-91, Hewlett Packard Labs., 1997.
 
3
R. Das, J. E. Hanson, J. O. Kephart, and G. Tesauro. Agent-human interactions in the continuous double auction. In Proceedings of L}CAI-01, San Francisco, CA, 2001. Morgan Kaufmann.
 
4
S. Gjerstad and J. Dickhaut. Price formation in double auctions. Games and Economic Behavior, 22:129, 1998.
 
5
D. Gode and S. Sunder. Allocative efficiency of markets with zero intellegence traders: Market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. J. of Political Economy, 101:119137, 1993.
6
 
7
J. Rust, J. Miller, and R. Palmer. Behavior of trading automata in a computerized double auction market. In D. Friedman and J. Rust, editors, The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories, and Evidence, Redwood City, CA, 1992. Addison-Wesley.
 
8
J. Rust, J. Miller, and R. Palmer. Characterizing effective trading strategies: Insights from the computerized double auction tournament. J. of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18:6196, 1994.
 
9
V. L. Smith. An experimental study of competitive market behavior. J. of Political Economy, 70:111137, 1962.
 
10
V. L. Smith. Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. American Economic Review, 72:923 955, 1982.

CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Gerald Tesauro: colleagues
Rajarshi Das: colleagues