ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Concepts for personal location privacy policies
Full text PdfPdf (246 KB)
Source Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce table of contents
Tampa, Florida, USA
Pages: 48 - 57  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-387-1
Author
Einar Snekkenes  Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, Norway
Sponsor
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 140,   Citation Count: 15
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/501158.501164
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A Location Based Service (LBS) is a service where knowledge of the location of an object or individual is used to personalise the service. Typical examples include the E911 emergency location service in the US and 'Where is the nearest xx' type of services. However, since these services often may be implemented in a way that exposes sensitive personal information, there are several privacy issues to consider. A key question is: "Who should have access to what location information under which circumstances?It is our view that individuals should be equipped with tools to become in the position to formulate their own personal location privacy policies, subject to applicable rules and regulations.This paper identifies concepts that may be useful when formulating such policies. The key concept is that of an observation of a located object. An observation typically includes the location, the identity of the object, the time the observation was made and the speed of the object. The idea is that the individual should be able to adjust the accuracy at which these observations are released depending on parameters such as the intended use and the identity of the recipient.We provide fragments of a language for formulating personal location privacy policies and give some small examples illustrating the kind of policies that we have in mind.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Bahl, P., and Padmanabhan, V. N. "Radar: An in-building rfbased user location and tracking system," In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom 2000, Tel-Aviv, Israel, vol. 2, Mar. 2000, pp. 775--784.
 
4
 
5
Fox, S. The Internet Life Report. Trust and Privacy Online: Why Americans Want to Rewrite the Rules. The Pew Internet & American Life Project. August 20, 2000. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Trust_Privacy_ Report.pdf
 
6
 
7
 
8
Norwegian parliament. 'Act of 14. April 2000 No. 31 relating to the processing of personal data (Personal Data Act)'. http://www.personvern.uio.no/regler/peol_engelsk.pdf
 
9
 
10
Reservasjonsregisteret. The Br~nn~ysund Register Centre. http://www.brreg.no/oppslag/reservasjon/index.html
 
11
Robinson, T. Location is everything. Internet week online, tuesday September 12, 2000. http://www.internetwk.com/lead/lead091200.htm
12
13
 
14
Sun Microsystems. JAVA Location Services. Java- Location Services: The New Standard for Location-enabled e-Business. http://www.mapinfo.com/community/free/library/java_locati on_svcs_whitepaper.pdf http://www.jlocationservices.com/company/ImageMatters/jav alocationServices.html
 
15
W3C. P3P and Privacy on the Web FAQ. http://www.w3.org/P3P/P3FAQ
 
16
W3C. Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P) Project. http://www.w3.org/P3P/
 
17
XMARC INC., WISE 2.0, http://www.xmarc.com/news_events/2001/press_air-xmarc. htm

CITED BY  15