ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Computer based testing: the ball state experience
Full text PdfPdf (150 KB)
Source User Services Conference; Vol. 29 archive
Proceedings of the 29th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services table of contents
Portland, Oregon, USA
Session: Technical Session table of contents
Pages: 201 - 203  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-382-0
Authors
Yasemin Tunc  Ball State University, Muncie, IN
Marchal Armstead  Ball State University, Muncie, IN
Sponsor
SIGUCCS: ACM Special Interest Group on University and College Computing Services
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 19,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/500956.501004
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

During the summer of 1999, Ball State University renovated space to construct a 24 station computer-based testing room for a pilot study with four faculty members. The idea for the testing lab came from faculty who instruct large classes. Based upon feedback from faculty and students, this project is a great success. CBT became available to all faculty fall 2000. In this presentation, we will focus on the following issues: Initial idea and buy-in by administrators. Finding the resources to create a new lab; The policies and procedures that govern the testing lab; Lab set up and staffing issues. We will share how the workstations were set up (technical details) in an attempt to curtail cheating. We will also touch on student lab assistant roles and the supervision of such a high profile facility; The home grown reservation and reporting program: This web based tool allows students to reserve a station for their test and produces utilization reports for management purposes; Advantages and challenges of the computer based testing environment. Audience; Lab coordinators/managers, any one involved in academic computing issues, or departmental computing would be a target audience for this presentation. In addition computing center directors or academic computing directors might be interested in how this project built a very positive bridge between our Computing Services and the academic departments (for once we made them happy.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Yasemin Tunc: colleagues
Marchal Armstead: colleagues