ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Knowledge capture and utilization in virtual communities
Full text PdfPdf (401 KB)
Source International Conference On Knowledge Capture archive
Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Knowledge capture table of contents
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Session: Technical Papers table of contents
Pages: 92 - 99  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-380-4
Authors
Yasmin Merali  The University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
John Davies  BTexact Technologies, Ipswich, United Kingdom
Sponsor
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 128,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/500737.500754
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The literature on knowledge management highlights issues of fit between IT-based systems for knowledge management and the socially situated leveraging of knowledge assets by organisations [1]. This paper explores the way in which a knowledge-sharing environment (KSE) can facilitate knowledge capture and utilization in virtual communities. The KSE (Jasper II) is a system of information agents for organising, summarizing and sharing knowledge from a number of internal and external sources, including the World Wide Web (WWW). The paper describes the features and functionality of Jasper II, and goes on to show how it can be leveraged to support the capture of both tacit and explicit knowledge in virtual communities. The final discussion focuses on the dynamics of the knowledge capture and utilization process, highlighting the importance of the feedback mechanisms that enable the KSE to meet the specific needs of diverse, evolving communities. It suggests that besides supporting the dynamic knowledge requirements of communities, the KSE can play a key role in the evolution of existing communities.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Merali, Y., "Information, Systems and Dasein", in Systems for Sustainability: People, Organisations and Environments, Stowell, F. , McRobb, I., Landor, R., Ison, R., Holoway, J., (Editors); pp 595-600, Plenum, (1997).
 
2
Schumpeter, J.A., The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. MA, (1934).
 
3
Markus, M.L., "Toward a Theory of Knowledge Reuse: Types of Knowlwdge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success " Journal of Management Information Systems, 18 (1), pp 57-93 (2001).
 
4
Polanyi, K., Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post- Critical Philosophy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, (1958).
 
5
Polanyi, K. ,The Tacit Dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, (1967).
 
6
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H., The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press, New York, (1995).
 
7
Argyris, C. and Schon, D. A., Organisational Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, (1978).
 
8
Merali, Y., "Leveraging Capabilities: A Cognitive Congruence Framework" in Knowledge Management and Organizational Competence, Ed. Sanchez, R., Oxford University Press, New York, (2001).
 
9
Merali, Y., "Individual and collective congruence in the knowledge Management Process", Journal of Strategic Information Management, 9 (2-3): Special Issue on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems, (2000), pp 213-234.
 
10
Wenger, E., Communities of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (1998).
 
11
Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P.. "Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation", Organization Science, 2, pp 40-57, (1991).
 
12
Merali, Y. "Information Technology and Dasein" Working Paper, Warwick Business School, (2000)
 
13
 
14
 
15
McGill, M.et al., 1979. "An evaluation of factors affecting document ranking by IR Systems," Project Report. Syracuse, NY, USA: Syracuse University School of Information Studies.
 
16
 
17
Ackerman, M.S. Definitional and Contextual Issues in Organizational and Group Memories, University of California, Irvine, (1994), Available at http//www.ics.uci.edu/-ackerman/.
 
18
Granovetter, M., "The Strength of Weak Ties", American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380, (1974).
 
19
Granovetter, M., "The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited", in Social Structure and Network Analysis, Marsden, P. and Nan, L. (Editors), Sage Publications, California, (1982)
 
20
Constant, D., Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S., "The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice", Organization Science, 7 (2), 119-135, (1996).
 
21
Hansen, M.T., "The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organisation Subunits", Working Paper, Harvard Business School, 1997


Collaborative Colleagues:
Yasmin Merali: colleagues
John Davies: colleagues