ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Design of a virtual auditorium
Full text PdfPdf (1.08 MB)
Source International Multimedia Conference; Vol. 9 archive
Proceedings of the ninth ACM international conference on Multimedia table of contents
Ottawa, Canada
Session: Video Applications table of contents
Pages: 19 - 28  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-394-4
Author
Milton Chen  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Sponsors
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 44,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/500141.500147
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We built a videoconference system called the Virtual Auditorium to support dialog-based distance learning. The instructor can see dozens of students on a tiled wall-sized display and establish eye contact with any student. Telephone-quality audio and television-quality video can be streamed using commodity codecs such as wavelet and MPEG-4. Support for stream migration allows a seamless user interface to span the multiple computers driving the display wall..We performed user studies on the auditorium parameters. We found that the optimal display wall size must balance two contradictory requirements: subjects prefer larger videos for seeing facial expressions and smaller videos for seeing everyone without head movement. Ideally, each video should have a field of view that spans 14 degrees, which corresponds to a slightly larger than life-size image. At the very least, each video should have a field of view of 6 degrees. We found that a video window should be less than 2.7 degrees horizontally and 9 degrees vertically from the camera in order to maintain the appearance of eye contact for the remote viewer. In addition, we describe a previously unreported gaze phenomenon: a person's expectation determines his perception of eye contact under ambiguous conditions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
AccessGrid. http://www-fp.mcs.anl.govlfllaccessgrid
 
3
M. Argyle and M. Cook. Gaze and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge University Press, 1976.
 
4
J. Bransford, A. Brown, and R. Cocking. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. National Academy Press, 2000.
 
5
W. Buxton. Living in Augmented Reality: Ubiquitous Media and Reactive Environments. Video-Mediated Communication (edited by K. Finn, A. Sellen, and S. Wilbur), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pages 363-384, 1997.
 
6
W. Buxton, A. Sellen, M. Sheasby. Interfaces for Multiparty Videoconferences. Video-Mediated Communication (edited by K. Finn, A. Sellen, and S. Wilbur), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pages 385-400, 1997.
 
7
M. Cline. The Perception of Where a Person is Looking. American Journal of Psychology, pages 41-50, 1967.
8
 
9
J. Gibbons, W. Kincheloe, and K. Down. Tutored Videotape Instruction: a New Use of Electronics Media in Education. Science, pages 1139-l 146, 1977.
 
10
J. Gibson and A. Pick. Perception of Another Person's Looking Behavior. American Journal of Psychology, pages 386-394, 1963.
11
12
 
13
 
14
E. Isaacs and J. Tang. Studying Video-Based Collaboration in Context: from Small Workgroups to Large Organizations. Video-Mediated Communication, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pages 173-197, 1997.
15
 
16
P. Jackson. The Teacher and The Machine. Horace Mann Lecture, 1967.
17
 
18
R. Kraut and R. Fish. Prospects for Videotelephony. Video-Mediated Communication (edited by K. Finn, A. Sellen, and S. Wilbur), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pages 541-561, 1997.
 
19
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Mbone tools. http:Nwww-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/nrg.html
 
20
 
21
S. McCanne, E. Brewer, R. Katz, L. Rowe, E. Amir, Y. Chawathe, A. Coopersmitb, K. Patel, S. Raman, A. Schuett, D. Simpson, A. Swan, T. Tung, D. Wu, and B. Smith. Toward a Common Infrastructure for Multimedia-Networking Middleware. Proceedings of International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video, 1997.
22
 
23
A. Noll. Anatomy of a Failure: PicturePhone Revisited. Telecommunications Policy, pages 307-3 16, 1992.
 
24
NSF Workshop on Facial Expression Understanding, 1992. http://mambo.ucsc.edu/psl/nsf.txt
 
25
R. Ochsman and A. Chapanis. The Effects of 10 Communication Modes on the Behavior of Teams During Co-operative Problem-Solving. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, pages 579-619, 1974.
26
 
27
B. Reeves and C. Nass. The Media Equation. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
 
28
R. Riez and E. Klemmer. Subjective Evaluation of Delay and Echo Suppressers in Telephone Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, pages 2919-2942, 1963.
 
29
L. Rowe. ACM Multimedia Tutorial on Distance Learning, 2000.
 
30
A. Sellen. Remote Conversations: The Effects of Mediating Talk with Technology. Human-Computer Interaction, pages 401-444, 1995.
 
31
Stanford Instructional Television Network. http://www-sitn.stanford.edu
 
32
R. Stokes. Human Factors and Appearance Design Considerations of the Mod II PicturePhone Station Set. IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology, pages 318-323, 1969
 
33
University College London Mbone tools. http://www-mice.cs.ucl.ac.uk/multimedia/software
 
34

CITED BY  14