ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Special relations in automated deduction
Full text PdfPdf (4.03 MB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 33 ,  Issue 1  (January 1986) table of contents
The MIT Press scientific computation series
Pages: 1 - 59  
Year of Publication: 1986
ISSN:0004-5411
Authors
Zohar Manna  Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA
Richard Waldinger  SRI International, Menlo Park, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 25,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/4904.4905
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Two deduction rules are introduced to give streamlined treatment to relations of special importance in an automated theorem-proving system. These rules, the relation replacement and relation matching rules, generalize to an arbitrary binary relation the paramodulation and E-resolution rules, respectively, for equality, and may operate within a nonclausal or clausal system. The new rules depend on an extension of the notion of polarity to apply to subterms as well as to subsentences, with respect to a given binary relation. The rules allow us to eliminate troublesome axioms, such as transitivity and monotonicity, from the system; proofs are shorter and more comprehensible, and the search space is correspondingly deflated.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ANDERSON, R. Completeness results for E-resolution. In Proceedings of AFIPS Spring Joint Computer Conference. AFIPS Press, Reston, Va., 1970, 652-656.
 
2
BOYER, R. S. AND MOORE, J.S. A Computational Logic. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla., 1979.
 
3
BRAND, D. Proving theorems with the modification method. SlAM J. Comput. 4, 2 (1975), 412-430.
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
LOVELAND, D. W. Automated Theorem Proving: A Logical Basis. North-Holland, New York, 1978.
8
 
9
MANNA, Z. AND WALDINGER, R. Deductive synthesis of the unification algorithm. Sci. Comput. Prog. 1 ( 1981 ), 5-48.
 
10
MANNA, Z., AND WALDINGER, R. Special relations in program-synthetic deduction. Tech. Rep. Comput. Sci. Dept., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif., and Artificial Intelligence Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, Calif., March 1982.
 
11
 
12
 
13
MANNA, Z., AND WALDINGER, R. The origin of the binary-search paradigm, in Proceedings ofthe 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Los Angeles, Calif., Aug. 18-23). Morgan-Kaufman Publishing, Los Altos, Calif., 1985, pp. 222-224.
 
14
MORRIS, J.B. E-resolution: Extension of resolution to include the equality relation. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Washington, DC, May 7-9). 1969, pp. 287-294.
 
15
MURRAY, N.V. Completely nonclausal theorem proving. Artif Intell. 18, 1 (1982), 67-85.
16
 
17
ROmNSON, J.A. Logic." Form and Function. North-Holland, New York, 1979.
 
18
STICKEL, M.E. A nonclausal connection-graph resolution theorem-proving program. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Pittsburgh, Pa., Aug. 18-20). American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, Calif., 1982, pp. 229-233.
 
19
TRAUGOTT, J. Deductive synthesis of sorting algorithms. Tech. Rep. Comput. Sci. Dept., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif. (forthcoming).
 
20
Wos, L., AND ROBINSON, G. Paramodulation and theorem proving in first order theories with equality. In Machine Intelligence, vol 4, B. Meltzer and D. Michie, Eds. American Elsevier, New York, 1969, pp. 135-150.

CITED BY  9


REVIEW

"Daniel L. Chester : Reviewer"

Many common binary relations present difficulties to automated theorem provers when they are axiomatized. The axioms for relations like equality, subset, and less than create large search spaces that are difficul  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Zohar Manna: colleagues
Richard Waldinger: colleagues