ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Comparison of analysis techniques for information requirement determination
Full text PdfPdf (1.10 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 31 ,  Issue 9  (September 1988) table of contents
Pages: 1090 - 1097  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Surya,B. Yadav  Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock
Ralph,R. Bravoco  Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock
Akemi,T. Chatfield  Univ. of Nevada, Los Vegas
T. M. Rajkumar  Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 77,   Citation Count: 18
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/48529.48533
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A comparison of systems analysis techniques, the Data Flow Diagram (DFD) and part of the Integrated Definition Method (IDEFo), is done using a new developmental framework.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Alford, M.W. A requirements engineering methodology for real time processing requirements. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-3, i (Jan. 1977).
 
2
Bravoco, R., and Yadav, S.B. A Methodology to Model the Functional Architecture of an Organization. Comput. Ind. 6, 5 (Oct. 1985).
 
3
Bravoco, R., and Yadav, S.B. Requirement definition architecture-- An overview. Comput. Ind. 6, 4 (Aug. 1985).
 
4
Campbell, D.T., and Stanley, J.C. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally College Publishing Company, Chicago, Illinois, 1963.
5
 
6
Colter, M.A. A comparative examination of systems analysis techniques. MIS Quarterly. To be published.
 
7
Cronbach, L.J. Essentials of Psychological Testing, 3rd Edition. Harper and Row, New York, N.Y., 1970.
 
8
Davis G.B. Strategies for information requirements determination. Working Paper Series MISRC-WP-82-02. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Sept. 1981.
 
9
 
10
Hansen, J.V., McKell, L.J., and Meitger, L.E. ISMS: Coraputer aided analysis for design of decision support systems. Manage. Sci. 25, 11 (Nov. 1979), 1069-1081.
 
11
Monro, M.C., and Davis, G.B. Determining management information needs: A comparison of methods. MIS Q. 1, 2 (1977), 55-77.
 
12
Ross, D.T., and Schoman, K.E., Jr. Structured analysis for requirement definition, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. Se-3, 1 (Jan. 1977).
13
 
14
Tiechroew, D., and Hershey, E.A. PSL/PSA: A computer aided technique for structured documentation and analysis of information processing systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-3, 1 (Jan. 1977).
 
15
Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskin, E., and Karp, S.A. Manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Consulting Psychologists Press, Pale Alto, CA, 1971.
 
16
17
 
18
Yeh, R.T., Araya, A., et al. Software requirements engineering--A perspective. Structured Software Development, State of the Art Report. Infotech, Intl. 2, 1979.
 
19
Young, J.W., and Kent, H. Abstract formulation of data processing problems. J. Ind. Eng. (Nov.-Dec., 1958), 471-479.

CITED BY  18

Collaborative Colleagues:
Surya,B. Yadav: colleagues
Ralph,R. Bravoco: colleagues
Akemi,T. Chatfield: colleagues
T. M. Rajkumar: colleagues