Bureaucracies as deontic systems

ABSTRACT

Bureaucratic offices are not only for clerical work, but more important, they are for officiating in the sense of issuing directives, granting permissions, enforcing prohibitions, waiving obligations, and so forth. Bureaucracies are thus deontic systems for organizational and social control. Conventional information processing approaches are inadequate for capturing these aspects of bureaucratic modeling. A logic-based representation that emphasizes deontic and performative aspects is proposed.

REFERENCES

• 1: ABRAHAMSON, B. Bureaucracy or Participation: The Logic of Organization. Sage Publications, London, 1977.
• 2: ANDERSSON, J.S. How to Define "Performative." Univ. of Uppsala, Sweden, 1975.
• 3: AUSTIN, J.L. How to DO Things with Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1962.
• 4: BURNS, T., AND STALKER, G.M. The Management of Innovation. Tavistock, London, 1961.
• 5: DowNs, A. Inside Bureaucracy. Little, Brown, Boston, 1967.
• 6: ELGIN, D. S., AND BUSHELL, R. A. The limits to complexity: Are bureaucracies becoming unmanageable? Futurist (Dec. 1977).
• 7: FROST, R. North of Boston, 1914. In The Poetry of Robert Frost, E. C. Lathen, Ed. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, 1969.
• 8: Jay R. Galbraith, Designing Complex Organizations, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1973
• 9: GALBRAITH, J. Organization Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1977.
• 10: HILPINEN, R., ED. Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981.
• 11: HILPINEN, R., ED. New Studies in Deontic Logic. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981.
• 12: KIMBROUGH, S., AND LEE, R. On illocutionary logic as a telecommunications language. In Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems (San Diego, Dec. 15-17). 1986, pp. 15-26.
• 13: KIMBROUGH, S., LEE, R., AND NESS, D. Performative, informative and emotive systems: The first piece of the PIE. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (Tucson, Ariz., Nov. 28-30), 1984, pp. 141-148.
• 14: LEE, R. Automating red tape: The performative vs informative roles of bureaucratic documents. Off. Technol. People 1, 2 (1984), 187-204.
• 15: LEE, R. M. Bureaucracy as artificial intelligence. In Knowledge Representation for Decision Support, Proceedings of IFIP WG 8.3 Working Conference {Durham, England, July). North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1984.
• 16: Ronald M. Lee , Ronald Stamper, Ontological aspects of logical databases, Information Systems, v.10 n.3, p.331-338, 1985 [doi>10.1016/0306-4379(85)90026-2]
• 17: LEE, R., COELHO, H., AND COTTA, J.C. Temporal inferencing on administrative databases, inf. Syst. 10, 2 (1985), 197-206.
• 18: LYYTINEN, K.J. Theories of language and information systems: An appraisal of alternative language views for information systems. In International Conference on Information Systems {Tucson, Ariz., Nov. 28-30), 1984.
• 19: MARCH, J. G., AND SIMON, H.A. Organizations. Wiley, New York, 1958.
• 20: James Lyle Peterson, Petri Net Theory and the Modeling of Systems, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1981
• 21: RESCHER, N., AND URQUHART, A. Temporal Logic. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971.
• 22: David Rozenshtein , Naftaly Minsky, Controlling the use and evolution of database systems: A Prolog-based approach, Journal of Management Information Systems, v.3 n.1, p.5-31, Summer 1986
• 23: SEARLE, J. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1969.
• 24: SEARLE, J., AND VANDERVEKEN, D. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1985.
• 25: M. J. Sergot , F. Sadri , R. A. Kowalski , F. Kriwaczek , P. Hammond , H. T. Cory, The British Nationality Act as a logic program, Communications of the ACM, v.29 n.5, p.370-386, May 1986 [doi>10.1145/5689.5920]
• 26: SIMON, H.A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econ. 69 (1955).
• 27: STAMPER, R. LEGOL as a tool for the study of bureaucracy. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 Conference on the Interaction of Information Systems and the Organization (Bonn, West Germany, June 11-13). North-Holland, 1980.
• 28: TAYLOR, F. The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper and Row, New York, 1911.
• 29: THOMPSON, V. A. Bureaucracy and bureaupathology. In Organizational Behavior and the Practice of Management, Hampton, Summer, and Webber, Eds. Scott-Foresman, Glenview, Ill., 1978, pp. 353-364.
• 30: VON WRIGHT, G. H. An essay in deontic logic and the general theory of action. In Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 21. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968.
• 31: WEBER, M. Economy and Society. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1978. Translated from Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, J. C. B. Mohr. Tuebingen, 1956.
• 32: WIENER, N. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Avon Books, New York, 1967.
• 33: Terry Winograd, A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work, Proceedings of the 1986 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, December 03-05, 1986, Austin, Texas [doi>10.1145/637069.637096]
• 34: Terry Winograd , Fernando Flores, Understanding computers and cognition, Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1986
• 35: ZISMAN, M. Representation, specification and automation of office procedures. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Decision Sciences, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa., 1977.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
      I.2.4 Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods
          Subjects: Representations (procedural and rule-based)

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS
      H.4.2 Types of Systems
          Subjects: Decision support (e.g., MIS)

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
      I.2.4 Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods
          Subjects: Predicate logic

  J. Computer Applications

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS

General Terms:
Design, Languages, Management