ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Analysis of the binary complexity of asymptotically fast algorithms for linear system solving
Full text PdfPdf (409 KB)
Source ACM SIGSAM Bulletin archive
Volume 22 ,  Issue 2  (April 1988) table of contents
Pages: 41 - 49  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISSN:0163-5824
Authors
Brent Gregory  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Erich Kaltofen  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/43876.43880
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Two significant developments can be distinguished in the theory of algebraic algorithm design. One is that of fast algorithms in terms of counting the arithmetic operations, such as the asymptotically fast matrix multiplication procedures and related linear algebra algorithms or the asymptotically fast polynomial multiplication procedures and related polynomial manipulation algorithms. The other is to observe the actual bit complexity when such algorithms are performed for concrete fields, in particular the rational numbers. It was discovered in the mid-1960s that for rational polynomial GCD operations the classical algorithm can lead to exponential coefficient size growth. The beautiful theory of subresultants by Collins [7] and Brown & Traub [5] explains, however, that the size growth is not inherent but a consequence of over-simplified rational arithmetic. Similar phenomena were observed for the Gaussian elimination procedure [2], [9].


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Bareiss, E. H., "Sylvester's identity and multistep integers preserving Gaussian elimination," <i>Math. Comp.</i>, vol. 22, pp. 565--578, 1968.
 
3
Brent, R. P., Gustavson, F. G., and Yun, D. Y. Y., "Fast solution of Toeplitz systems of equations and computation of Pad&eacute; approximants," <i>J. Algorithms</i>, vol. 1, pp. 259--295, 1980.
4
5
 
6
Bunch, J. R. and Hopcroft, J. E., "Triangular factorization and inversion by fast matrix multiplication," <i>Math. Comp.</i>, vol. 28, pp. 231--236, 1974.
7
8
 
9
Edmonds, J., "Systems of distinct representatives and linear algebra," <i>J. Research National Bureau Standards B</i>, vol. 71B, pp. 241--245, 1967.
 
10
Gantmacher, F. R., <i>The Theory of Matrices, Vol. 1</i>, Chelsea Publ. Co., New York, N. Y., 1960.
 
11
Leighton, F. T., "Gaussian elimination over the rationals," Unpublished Manuscript, Applied Math. Dept., MIT, 1980.
12
13
 
14
 
15
Strassen, V., "Gaussian elimination is not optimal," <i>Numerische Mathematik</i>, vol. 13, pp. 354--356, 1969.
 
16
Waerden, B. L. van der, <i>Modern Algebra</i>, F. Ungar Publ. Co., New York, 1953.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Brent Gregory: colleagues
Erich Kaltofen: colleagues