Factors of success for end-user computing

ABSTRACT

A two-phase study concerned with the factors of success associated with the development of computer applications by end users was conducted in 10 large organizations. During the first phase, in-depth interviews were used to refine a preliminary model of the factors of success for user development of computer applications (UDA). In the second phase, a questionnaire was administered to 272 end users experienced in developing applications. Statistical tests of the relationships in the model indicated that all but one of the derived hypotheses were substantiated. The result of this study is a field-verified model of the factors of success of UDA that provides a basis for implementation of UDA practices and policies in organizations, as well as for further research in end-user computing.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bagozzi, R.P. Causal modeling: A general method for developing and testing theories in consumer research. In Advances in Consumer Research, K.B. Monroe, Ed. Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1982, pp. 195-202.
• 2: Beckhard, R., and Harris, R.T. Organizational Transitions: Managing Complex Change. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1977.
• 3: Benson, D.H. A field study of end-user computing: Findings and issues. MIS Q. 7, 4 {Dec. 1983), 35-46.
• 4: Bradish, J.R. Administration of an information center user's experience. In Proceedings GUIDE 52 (Atlanta, Ga., May 10-14). IBM, 1981, pp. 656-662.
• 5: Canning Publications. Future effects of end-user computing. EDP Anat. 21, 11 (Nov. 1983), pp. 1-16.
• 6: Canning Publications. Coping with end-user computing. EDP Anal. 22, 1 (1984).
• 7: Comper, F.A. Experience with information center. In Proceedings GUIDE 51 (Miami, Fla., May 19-23}. IBM, 1980, pp. 1654-1665.
• 8: Davis, G.B. Caution: User-developed decision support systems can be hazardous to your organization. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Hawaii Conference on System Science (Honolulu, Hawaii, Jan. 6-8). 1982.
• 9: Gordon B. Davis , Margrethe H. Olson, Management information systems: conceptual foundations, structure, and development (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1984
• 10: Eason, K.D., Damodovan, L., and Stewart, T.F.M. Interface problems in man-computer interactions. In Human Choice and Computers. E. Mumford and H. Sackman, eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975, pp. 91-105.
• 11: Fornell, C., and Barclay, D.W. Jackknifing: A supplement to Lohm611er's LVPLS program. Graduate School of Business Administration, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1983.
• 12: Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 1 (Feb. 1981}, 39-50.
• 13: Fornell, C., Tellis, G.J., and Zinkhan, G.M. Validity assessment: A structural equations approach using partial least squares. In AMA Educators Proceedings (Chicago, I11., Aug. 1-4). American Press Association, Chicago, Ii1., 1982, pp. 405-409.
• 14: Greiner, L.E. Patterns of organization change. Harvard Bus. Rev. 45, 3 (May-June 1967), 119-128.
• 15: Guimaraes, T. The benefits and problems of user computing. J. Inf. Syst. Manage. l, 4 (Fall. 1984), 8-9.
• 16: Blake Ives , Margrethe H. Olson , Jack J. Baroudi, The measurement of user information satisfaction, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.10, p.785-793, Oct. 1983 [doi>10.1145/358413.358430]
• 17: Johnson, R.T. The infocenter experience. Datamation 30, 1 (Jan. 1984), 137-142.
• 18: J6reskog, K.G, and S6rbom, D. LISRELV: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood and Least Squares Methods. National Educational Resources, Chicago, I11., 1981.
• 19: Kerlinger, F.N. Foundations of Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1973.
• 20: Robert L Leitheiser , James C Wetherbe, The successful information center: what does it take?, Proceedings of the twenty-first annual conference on Computer personnel research, p.56-65, May 02-03, 1985, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States [doi>10.1145/16687.16694]
• 21: Lohm611er, J.B. LVPLS 1.6: Latent Variables Path Analysis with Partial Least Squares Estimations. University of the Federal Armed Forces, Munich, W. Ger., 1981.
• 22: James Martin, Application Development without Programmers, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1982
• 23: Martin, J.H., Carlisle, }.H., and Tren, S. The user interface for interactive bibliographic searching: An analysis of the attitudes of nineteen information scientists. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 24, 2 (Mar.-Apr., 1973), 47-66.
• 24: McClean, E.R. End-users as application developers. MIS Q. 3, 3 (Dec. 1979), 37-46.
• 25: McCracken, D.D. Software in the 80s: Perils and promises. Computerworld 14, 38 (Sept., 1980), 5-10.
• 26: McKeen, J.D. Successful development strategies for business application systems. MIS Q. 7, 3 (Sept., 1983), 47-66.
• 27: Meyers, K., and Harper, M. User friendliness. MIS Q. 8, 1 (Mar., 1984), 1-3.
• 28: Nie, N.H., Hull, C.H.. Jenkins, J.G., Steinbrenner, K., and Bent, D.H. SPSS. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
• 29: Nolan, R.L.. and Seward, H.H. Measuring user satisfaclion to evaluate information systems. In Managing the Data Resource Function, R.L. Nolan, Ed. Western Publishing Co., Racine, Wisc., 1974, pp. 153-275.
• 30: Nunnally, J. Psychometric Methods. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
• 31: Powers, R.F., and Dickson, G.W. MIS project management: Myths, opinions and reality. Calif. Manage. Rev. 15, 3 (Spring, 1973), 147-156.
• 32: Quillard, }.A., Rockart, J.F., Wilde, E., Vernon, M., and Mock, G. A study of the corporate use of personal computers. CISR WP 109, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 1983.
• 33: Rivard, S., and Huff, S. User developed applications: Evaluation of success from the DP department perspective. MIS Q. 8, I (Mar., 1984), 39-50.
• 34: Rockart, J.F, and Flannery, L.S. The management of end-user computing. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Systems (Cambridge, Mass.. Dec. 7-9). 1981, pp. 351-363.
• 35: John F. Rockart , Lauren S. Flannery, The management of end user computing, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.10, p.776-784, Oct. 1983 [doi>10.1145/358413.358429]
• 36: Schendel, D.E., and Hofer, W., Eds. Strategic Management. Little Brown and Co., Boston, Mass., 1979.
• 37: Siegel, S. Nonparametric Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1956.
• 38: Mary Sumner, Organization and management of the information center: case studies, Proceedings of the twenty-first annual conference on Computer personnel research, p.38-49, May 02-03, 1985, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States [doi>10.1145/16687.16692]
• 39: Westbrook, R.A. A rating scale for measuring product service satisfaction. J. Mark. 44, 4 (Fall 1980). 68-72.
• 40: Wold, H. Soft modeling--The basic design and some extensions. In Systems under Indirect Observation--II, K.G. J6reskog and H. Wold, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982, pp. 1-54.
• 41: Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., and Holberg, J. Innovations and Organizations. Wiley, New York, 1973.
• 42: Zloof, M.M. Design aspects of the query-by-example data base management language. In Databases: Improving Usability and Responsiveness, B. Schneiderman, Ed. Academic Press, New York, 1978, pp. 3-28.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux

General Terms:
Human Factors, Management