ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Parallel text search methods
Full text PdfPdf (1.53 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 31 ,  Issue 2  (February 1988) table of contents
Pages: 202 - 215  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Gerard Salton  Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY
Chris Buckley  Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 44,   Citation Count: 17
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/42372.42380
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A comparison of recently proposed parallel text search methods to alternative available search strategies that use serial processing machines suggests parallel methods do not provide large-scale gains in either retrieval effectiveness or efficiency.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bergmark, D., and Hanushevsky, A. Document retrieval: A novel application for the AP. FPS User's Group Meeting, Los Angeles, Calif., 1980.
2
 
3
Chang, Y.K., Cirillo, C., and Razon, J. Evaluation of feedback retrieval using modified freezing, residual collection and test and control groups. In The Smart Retrieval System--Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, G. Salton, Ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1971, Chap. 17, pp. 355-370.
 
4
 
5
Cooper, W.S. Exploiting the maximum entropy principle to increase retrieval effectiveness. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 34, 1 (Jan. 1983), 31-39.
6
 
7
Croft, W.B. A model of cluster searching based on classification. Inf. Syst. 5, 3 (1980), 189-195.
8
9
 
10
Hall, H.A., and Weiderman, N.H. The evaluation problem in relevance feedback systems, Rep. ISR-12 to the NSF, sect. XII, Dept. of Computer Science, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y., June 1967.
 
11
Henry, W.M., Leigh, J.A., Tedd, L.A., and Williams, P.W. On-Line Searching--An Introduction. Butterworth, Woburn, Mass., 1980.
 
12
Hollaar, L.A., and Stellhorn, W.H. A specialized architecture for textual information retrieval. In Proceedings of AFIPS National Computer Conference, vol. 46 (Dallas, Tex., June 13-16). AFIPS Press, Reston, Va., 1977, pp. 697-702.
 
13
Ide, E. New experiments in relevance feedback. Rep. ISR-14 to the NSF, sect. VIII, Dept. of Computer Science, Corneli Univ., Ithaca, N.Y., Oct. 1968. (Also in The Smart Retrieval System--Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, G. Salton, Ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1971, chap. 16, pp. 337-354.
 
14
 
15
Lancaster, F.W. Information Retrieval Systems: Characteristics, Testing and Evaluation. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, 1979.
16
 
17
 
18
Mooers, C.N. Zatocoding applied to mechanical organization of knowledge. Am. Doc. 2, 1 (Winter 1951), 20-32.
19
 
20
Roberts, C.S. Partial match retrieval via the method of superimposed codes. Proc. IEEE 67, 12 (Dec. 1979), 1624-1642.
 
21
Rocchio, J.}., Jr. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. Sci. Rep. ISR-9, Harvard Computation Laboratory, Cambridge, Mass., Aug. 1965. (Also in The Smart Retrieval System--Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, G. Salton, Ed. Prentice-Hall, Engtewood Cliffs, N.J., 1971, chap. 14, pp. 313-323.
22
 
23
Salton, G. The evaluation of automatic retrieval proceduresw Selected test results using the Smart system. Am. Doc. 16, 3 (June 1965}, 209-222.
 
24
Salton, G. Relevance feedback and the optimization of retrieval effectiveness. Sci. Rep. ISR-12, Dept. of Computer Science, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y., June 1967. (Also in The Smart Retrieval System--Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, G. Salton, Ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1971, chap. 15, pp. 324-336.)
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
Salton, G. Smart. In Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 13, J. Belzer, A.G. Holzman, and A. Kent, Eds. Dekker, New York, 1979, pp. 137-172.
29
 
30
31
 
32
33
 
34
35
36
 
37
Salton, G., Yang, C.S., and Yu, C.T. A theory of term importance in automatic text analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 26, 1 (Jan.-Feb. 1975}, 33-44.
 
38
Schuster, S.A., Nguyen, H.B., Ozkarahan, E.A., and Smith. K.C. RAP2--An associative processor for data bases and its applications. IEEE Trans. Comput. C-28, 6 (June 1979}, 446-458.
 
39
Sparck )ones, K. Some thoughts on classification for retrieval. J. Doc. 26, 2 {June 1970), 89-101.
 
40
Sparck )ones, K. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. J. Doc. 28, 1 (Mar. 1972), 11-21.
41
 
42
Stellhorn, W.H. An inverted file processor for information retrieval, IEEE Trans. Comput. C-26, 12 (Dec. 1977), 1258-1267.
 
43
 
44
Su, S.Y.W. Cellular logic devices: Concepts and applications. Computer 12, 3 (Mar. 1979}, 11-25.
45
 
46
 
47
Vernimb, V. Automatic query adjustment in document retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 13, 6 (1977}, 339-353.
 
48

CITED BY  17


REVIEW

"Duncan A. Buell : Reviewer"

Recent papers by Stanfill and Kahle [1] and Waltz [2] have demonstrated that the Connection Machine (CM) can be used effectively for document retrieval. The purpose of this paper is to show that indexed retrieval systems such as the SMART system  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Gerard Salton: colleagues
Chris Buckley: colleagues