ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An overview of the SR language and implementation
Full text PdfPdf (2.98 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) archive
Volume 10 ,  Issue 1  (January 1988) table of contents
Pages: 51 - 86  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISSN:0164-0925
Authors
Gregory R. Andrews  Univ. of Arizona, Tucson
Michael Coffin  Univ. of Arizona, Tucson
Irving Elshoff  Univ. of Arizona, Tucson
Kelvin Nilson  Univ. of Arizona, Tucson
Gregg Townsend  Univ. of Arizona, Tucson
Ronald A. Olsson  Univ. of California at Davis, Davis
Titus Purdin  Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 64,   Citation Count: 41
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/42192.42324
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

SR is a language for programming distributed systems ranging from operating systems to application programs. On the basis of our experience with the initial version, the language has evolved considerably. In this paper we describe the current version of SR and give an overview of its implementation. The main language constructs are still resources and operations. Resources encapsulate processes and variables that they share; operations provide the primary mechanism for process interaction. One way in which SR has changed is that both resources and processes are now created dynamically. Another change is that inheritance is supported. A third change is that the mechanisms for operation invocation—call and send—and operation implementation—proc and in—have been extended and integrated. Consequently, all of local and remote procedure call, rendezvous, dynamic process creation, asynchronous message passing, multicast, and semaphores are supported. We have found this flexibility to be very useful for distributed programming. Moreover, by basing SR on a small number of well-integrated concepts, the language has proved easy to learn and use, and it has a reasonably efficient implementation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ADA. Reference manual for the Ada programming language. ANSI/MIL-STD-1815A, American National Standards Institute, New York, Jan. 1983.
2
 
3
ANDREWS, G. R. The distributed programming language SR-Mechanisms, design and imple mentation. Softw. Pratt. Exper. 12, 8 (Aug. 1982), 719-754.
 
4
ANDREWS, G. R., AND OLSSON, R. A. The evolution of the SR language. D&rib. Comput. 1, 3 (July 1986), 133-149.
 
5
ANDREWS, G. R., AND OLSSON, R. A. Revised report on the SR programming language. TR 87- 27, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz., Nov. 1987.
 
6
 
7
ATKINS, S. Experiments in SR with different upcall program structures. Tech. Rep. Dept. of Computer Science, Simon Fraser Univ., Burnaby, B.C., Canada, Apr. 1987.
 
8
ATKINS, S., AND OLSSON, R. A. Performance of multitasking and synchronisation mechanisms. CSE-87-10, Div. of Computer Science, Univ. of California at Davis, July 1987.
 
9
10
 
11
BLACK, A. P., HUTCHINSON, N., MCCORD, B. C., AND RAJ, R. K. EPL programmer's guide. Eden Project, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, Wash., June 1984.
 
12
13
14
 
15
CHERITON, D. R. The V kernel: A software base for distributed systems. IEEE Software 1, 2 (Apr. 1984), 19-42.
16
17
18
 
19
COOK R. *Mod-A language for distributed programming. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-6, 6 (Nov. 1980), 563-571.
20
 
21
 
22
23
24
 
25
26
27
28
 
29
MITCHELL, J. G., MAYBURY, W., AND SWEET, R. Mesa language manual, version 5.0. Rep. CSL- 79-3, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, Calif, Apr. 1979.
 
30
 
31
PARR, F. N., AND STROM, R. E. NIL: A high-level language for distributed systems programming. IBM Syst. J. 22, l/2 (1983), 111-:127.
 
32
33
 
34
SCHLICHTING, R. D., CRISTIAN, F., AND PURDIN, T. Mechanisms for failure handling in distributed programming languages. TR 87-13, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz., June 1987.
 
35
 
36
STROM, R. E., AND YEMINI, S. NIL: An integrated language and system for distributed{ programming. Res. Rep. RC 9949, IBM Research Division, Yorktown Heights, N.Y., Apr. 1983.
37
 
38
WIRTH, N. Modula: A language for modular multiprogramming. Softw. Pratt. Enper. 7, (1977), 3-35.
 
39

CITED BY  41


REVIEW

"Peter Milligan : Reviewer"

This long and somewhat complicated paper presents, as the title suggests, an overview of the SR language and its implementation. The SR language was redesigned and reimplemented following extensive use of its predecessor SR0. The au  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Gregory R. Andrews: colleagues
Michael Coffin: colleagues
Irving Elshoff: colleagues
Kelvin Nilson: colleagues
Gregg Townsend: colleagues
Ronald A. Olsson: colleagues
Titus Purdin: colleagues