Conceptual retrieval and case law

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Conceptual retrieval and case law

Full text

Pdf (1.36 MB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Pages: 106 - 115

Year of Publication: 1987

ISBN:0-89791-230-6

Author

J. P. Dick

Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada

Sponsor

SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 19, Citation Count: 11

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/41735.41748 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Bimbaum, g (1982). "Argument molecules: A functional representation of argument structure." Proceedings $rd~ American Association for Arti3cial Intelligence Conference, Pittsburgh PA. August, 1982.
	2	Bimbaum, L; Flowers, Margin; McGuire, R. (1980). "Towards an A! model of argumentation. "Proc'eedings 1st American Asstn'iation for Arti~cial Intelligence Conference, Stanford CA. August, 1980.
	3	Blackstone, W.T. (1971), "Crilgria of adequacy for judicial reasoning." World congress on philosophy and social philosophy, Brussels, t971. Brussels: Emile Bruylant. 233-242,
	4	Britton, Bruce K.; and Black, John R. (1985). Understandin,le e.~pasitory text: A theoretical attd practical Itomtbook for analyzing te.x'r. Hillsdalc, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
	5	Brkic, }ovan ~1986). Legal reasoning: Semantic and logical analysis. New York: Peter Lang.
	6	Brockriede, Wayne (1975). "Where is argument?" Journal of the American Forensic' Asscx'iation I i, 179-182.
	7	Charrow, Veda; Crandall, Jo Ann; and Charrow, Robert (1982). "Characteristics and functions of legal language," in Kittredge, Richard; and Lehrberger, John (editors) (1982). Sublanguage: Studies of language in restricted semantic domains. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 175-190.
	8	Cherry, C. (1978). On human communication: A :'erie,', a survey and a critk'ism. 3rd. ed. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
	9	dcBcssonct, Cary (3, (1982). "An automated approach to scientific codification," Rutgers computers and technology law journal 9(I), 27- 75.
	10	dcBcssonct, Car), (3.; and Cross, George R. (1984). "Representation of some aspects of causality." in Walter, Charles (editor) (1985), Computing power and legal reasoning. St, Paul, Minn.: West Publishing. 205-214.
	11	Dewey, $. (1927). Logical method and the law. Ithaca NY: Comcll. Reprinted in MacOuigan, Mark (editor) (1966). Juri.sprudenc'e: Readings and cases, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 548-552.
	12	Diclr~racm, R, (1965). The fundamentals of legal drafting. Boston: Little, Brown.
	13	Fillmore, Charles J. (1968). "The case for case." in Bach. Emmon Warner, and Harms, Robert Thomas (cdimrs) (1968). Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 0-88.
	14	Anne Von Der Lieth Gardner, An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning, 1984
	15	Anne von der Lieth Gardner, An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987
	16	Orishman, Ralph; and Kittredge, Richard (1986). Analyzing language in restricted domains: Stthlangttage desc'ription attd proces.~ing. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
	17	Carole Diane Hafner, An information retrieval system based on a computer model of legal knowledge., 1978
	18	Harrier, Carole (1981). "Representing knowledge in an information retrieval system." in Oddy, Robert Norman, et al. (editors) (1981). Information retrieval research. London: Buttcrworths.
	19	Hamplc, Dale (1979). "Motives in law: An adaptation of legal realism.*' Journal of the American Forensic' Association 15, 156-168.
	20	Harris, Z.$. (1968). Mathematical s,'uc'tures of language. New York: Wiley.
	21	Graeme Hirst, Semantic interpretation and the resolution of ambiguity, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1987
	22	Holmes, Oliver Wendell (1897). "The path of the law," in MacGuigan, Mark R. (1966). Jurisprudence: Readings and cases. Toronto: University of Toronto. 45-62..Rf Karlsgrcn, Hans (1977). "L"hallcnge paper: Homeosemy -- on the linguistics of information retrieval." in Walker, Donald E. and Karlsgren Hans (editors). (1977). Natural language in information science. FID Pub. 551. Stockholm: Skriptor.
	23	Kirtle, Richard; and Lehrberger, John (editors) (1982). Sublanguage: Studies of language in restricted semantic' domains. Berlin: Walter de Omyter.
	24	MacGuigan, Mark R. (1966). Jurisprudence: Readings and cases. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
	25	McCarty, L. Thome (1977), "Reflections on TAXMAN: An experiment in artificial intelligence and legal reasoning." Harvard law review,
	26	McCall, L. "Phome, and $ridhar~, N.S. (1980). "The mpmsemation of an evolving system of legal concepts I: Logical templates." Proceedings 3rd Biennial Conference of the Canadian Socie,ty for Computa. tional St,dies o/Intelligence. Victoria, B.C. 304-31 i.
	27	McCarty, L. Thome; and Sridharan, N.S. ( 1981 ). "The representation of an evolving system of legal concepts II: Prmmypes and deformations." Proceedings, 7th International Joint Conference on Arti~cial Intelligence, Vancouver, B.C., August, 1981. 246-253.
	28	McCarty, L. Thome; and Sridharan, N. S. (1982), A computational theory of legal argument. Technical Report LRP-TR-13, Laboratory for Computer Science Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
	29	Meadow, Charles T. (1979). "Information science and scientists in 2001" Journal of Information Science 1,217.222.
	30	Mellinkoff, David (1963). The language of the law, Boston: Little, Brown,
	31	Milner, James B. (1985). Cases and materials on contracts. 4th. ed. Edited by S.M. Waddams. Toronto: Emond Montgomery.
	32	Minsky, Marvin (1975). "A Framework for Representing Knowledge." in Winston, Patrick H. (editor) (1975) The Psychology of Computer Vision. Edited by Patrick H. Winston. New York: McGraw-Hill.
	33	O'Connor, John (1980). "Answer-passage retrieval by text searching." JASIS 31. 227-259
	34	R. N. Oddy, Information Retrieval Research, Butterworth-Heinemann, Newton, MA, 1981
	35	Perelman, Chaim (1963), The idea of justice and the problem of argument. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
	36	Perelman, Chaim; and OIbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric': A treatise on argumentation. NaCre Dame, IND: University of Notre Dame Press.
	37	Quillian, M. Ross (1968). "Semantic memory." in Minsky, Marvin Lee (editor) (I968). Semantic information processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 227-270.
	38	Rissland, Edwina L. (1982). "Examples in the legal domain: Hypg. theticats in contract law." Prvc'eeding$ 4th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. 96-99.
	39	Rissland, Edwina L. (1983). "Examples in legal reasoning: Legal hypotheticals." Proceedings 8th International /oint Conference on Arti~cial Intelligence. Karlsruhe, Germany. 90-93,
	40	Rissland, Edwina L, (1985). "Argument moves and hypotheticals." in Waiters, Charles (editor) (1985). Computing po,,er and legal reasoning. St. Paul, Minn,: West Publishing, 129-14~.
	41	G. Salton, The SMART Retrieval System—Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1971
	42	Gerard Salton, Dynamic information and library processing, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1975
	43	Gerard Salton , Michael J. McGill, Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1986
	44	Roger C. Schank, Conceptual Information Processing, Elsevier Science Inc., New York, NY, 1975
	45	Roger C. Schank , Janet L. Kolodner , Gerald DeJong, Conceptual information retrieval, Proceedings of the 3rd annual ACM conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.94-116, June 23-27, 1980, Cambridge, England
	46	J. F. Sowa, Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1984
	47	Sparck Jones, Karen (1971). Automatic keyword classification/or information retrien'al. London: Butterwo~hs.
	48	Sprawl, $. A. (1979). "Automating the legal reasoning process: A computer that uses regulations and statutes to draft legal documents," American Bar Foundation Research Journal, Winter, 1979. 1-81.
	49	Stone, Julius (1964) Legal system and lawyers' reasoqing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University,
	50	Toulmin, Stephen (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Camb6dge University Press.
	51	Toulmin, Stephen (1972), Human understanding, The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
	52	Tou!min, Stephen; Rieke, Richard D.; and Janik, Allan. (1979), An introduction to reasoning. New York: MacMillan.
	53	Waiters, Charles (editor) (1985). Computing power and law. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing, t985.
	54	White, Alan R. (1985). Grounds of liability: An intrtKhwtion to the philosophy of law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

CITED BY 11

	L. J. Matthijssen, An intelligent interface for legal databases, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.71-80, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States
	James Osborn , Leon Sterling, JUSTICE: a judicial search tool using intelligent concept extraction, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.173-181, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway
	Vijay Mital , Agathoclis Stylianou , Les Johnson, Conceptual information retrieval in litigation support systems, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.235-243, May 1991, Oxford, England
	Dephne Gelbart , J. C. Smith, Beyond boolean search: FLEXICON, a legal tex-based intelligent system, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.225-234, May 1991, Oxford, England
	Edwina L. Rissland , Jody J. Daniels, A hybrid CBR-IR approach to legal information retrieval, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.52-61, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States
	Maria L. Silveira , Berthier Ribeiro-Neto, Concept-based ranking: a case study in the juridical domain, Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, v.40 n.5, p.791-805, September 2004
	Edwina L. Rissland , David B. Skalak , M. Timur Friedman, BankXX: a program to generate argument through case-base research, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.117-124, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
	Steven O. Kimbrough , Thomas Y. Lee , Balaji Padmanabhan , Yinghui Yang, On original generation of structure in legal documents, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 24-28, 2003, Scotland, United Kingdom
	B. Moulin , H. Irandoust , M. Bélanger , G. Desbordes, Explanation and Argumentation Capabilities: Towards the Creation of More Persuasive Agents, Artificial Intelligence Review, v.17 n.3, p.169-222, May 2002
	John L. Yearwood , Andrew Stranieri, The generic/actual argument model of practical reasoning, Decision Support Systems, v.41 n.2, p.358-379, January 2006
	Andrew Stranieri , John Zeleznikow , John Yearwood, Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning, The Knowledge Engineering Review, v.16 n.4, p.331-348, December 2001