ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On strictness and its analysis
Full text PdfPdf (1.09 MB)
Source Annual Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages archive
Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages table of contents
Munich, West Germany
Pages: 144 - 155  
Year of Publication: 1987
ISBN:0-89791-215-2
Authors
T.-M. Kuo  Department of Computer Science, The State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York
P. Mishra  Department of Computer Science, The State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York
Sponsor
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/41625.41638
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We study the strictness problem for the untyped lambda-calculus and for an ML-like typed calculus. We establish that strictness is a necessary and sufficient condition for the “eager” evaluation of function arguments. For the untyped calculus, we show that the strictness problem is elementary and describe a complete algorithm for strictness analysis of convergent terms. We show that typed terms possess a much richer set of strictness properties. A type-theoretic characterization of strictness is developed and it is shown that the strictness properties of a term can be represented as a collection of types related to the standard term type. A set of type inference rules that support reasoning about strictness related types is given. The inference rules are shown to be invariant under type change by substitution. This provides a sound basis for reasoning about strictness properties of terms by considering only their principal type. For our final result, we describe a practical system that carries out type checking and strictness analysis simultaneously in a unified framework. Our main result is thus the discovery that the problem of strictness analysis is a particular case of type inference.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
Abramsky85
 
Barendregt81
Barendregt, H. P., The Larnbda Calculus: Its Syntax and Semantics, North- Holland, 1981.
 
Burns85
Burn, G. L., Hankin, C. L. and Abramsky, S., The Theory and Practice of Strictness Analysis for Higher-Order Functions, Research Report 85/6, Department of Computing, Imperial College.
 
ClackJones85
MiDa82
 
Goguen86
Goguen, J., Kirchner, C., Leinwald, S., Meseguer, J. and Winkler, T., Progress Report on the Rewrite Rule Machine, SIGARCH Newsletter, Maxch 1986.
 
Haankin85
Hudak86a
 
Hudak-Kranz
Hudak, P., Kranz, D., A combinatorbased compiler for a functional language, POPL XI, p. 121-131.
 
Hughes85
Johnsson
 
Kowalski
 
Kuo86
Kuo, T-M, A Practical Method for Strictness Analysis, Research Proficiency Paper, December 1986, SUNY Stony Brook.
Lindstrom86
 
Milner78
Milner, R., A theory of type polymorphism in programming, JCSS 17,3, p348-375, 1978.
MS82
 
Maurer85
Mitchell84
 
Mycroft80
 
Wadsworth71
Wadsworth, C. P., Semantics and Pragmatics of the lambda-calculus, Ph. D. Thesis, Oxford University, 1971.
 
Wadsworth76
Wadsworth, C. P., The relation between Computational and Denotational Properties for Scott's Doo-models of the Lambda-Calculus, SIAM J. Comput., 5, 3, September 1976.
 
Wray85
Wray, S. C., A New Strictness Detection Algorithm, Cambridge University, Manuscript, 21p, January 1985.