ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Applying summarization techniques for term selection in relevance feedback
Full text PdfPdf (253 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Pages: 1 - 9  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-331-6
Authors
Adenike M. Lam-Adesina  Univ. of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Gareth J. F. Jones  Univ. of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Sponsor
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 121,   Citation Count: 31
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/383952.383953
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Query-expansion is an effective Relevance Feedback technique for improving performance in Information Retrieval. In general query-expansion methods select terms from the complete contents of relevant documents. One problem with this approach is that expansion terms unrelated to document relevance can be introduced into the modified query due to their presence in the relevant documents and distribution in the document collection. Motivated by the hypothesis that query-expansion terms should only be sought from the most relevant areas of a document, this investigation explores the use of document summaries in query-expansion. The investigation explores the use of both context-independent standard summaries and query-biased summaries. Experimental results using the Okapi BM25 probabilistic retrieval model with the TREC-8 ad hoc retrieval task show that query-expansion using document summaries can be considerably more effective than using full-document expansion. The paper also presents a novel approach to term-selection that separates the choice of relevant documents from the selection of a pool of potential expansion terms. Again, this technique is shown to be more effective that standard methods.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J.J.Rocchio. "Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval" In The smart retrieval system, G. Salton, pages 313-323, 1971, Prentice Hall, Inc.
 
2
G.Salton and C.Buckley. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, pages 288-297, 1990.
 
3
C.Buckley, G.Salton, J.Allan, A.Singhal. Automatic Query Expansion using SMART, In Proceedings of the Third Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-3), pages 65-80, 1995, NIST.
 
4
S.E.Robertson, S.Walker, S.Jones, M. M.Hancock- Beaulieu and M.Gatford, Okapi at TREC-3, In Proceedings of the Third Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-3), pp109-216, 1995, NIST.
 
5
 
6
T.Strzalkowski, J.Wang and B.Wise. Summarization- Based Query Expansion in Information Retrieval, In Proceedings of the 17 th COLING, pages 1-21, Montreal, 1998.
 
7
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
D.Knaus, E.Mittendorf, P.Schauble, P.Sheridan. Highlighting Relevant Passages for users of the Interactive SPIDER Retrieval System, In Proceedings of the Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4), pages 233-238, 1995, NIST.
12
 
13
 
14
S.E.Robertson, S.Walker and M.Beaulieu, Okapi at TREC-7: automatic ad hoc, filtering, VLS and interactive track, In Proceedings of the Seventh Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-7), pages 253-264, 1998, NIST.
 
15
S.E.Robertson and S.Walker, Okapi/Keenbow at TREC-8, In Proceedings of the Eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-8), pages 151-162, 1999, NIST
 
16
Anastasios Tombros. Reflecting user information needs through query biased summaries. Thesis submitted towards the award of MSc in Advanced Information systems in the University of Glasgow. September 1997.
 
17
H.P.Luhn. The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 2(2), pages 159-165, 1958.
18
 
19
D.E.Kieras. Thematic Processes in the Comprehension of Technical Prose. In B.K Briton and J. B. Black eds, Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text, pages 89- 108, 1985, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
20
M.F.Porter, An algorithm for suffix stripping, Program, 14(3), pages 130-137, 1980
 
21
 
22
S.E.Robertson and K.Sparck Jones. Relevance Weighting of Search Terms, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(3), pages 129-146, 1976.
23
24
 
25
 
26

CITED BY  31

Collaborative Colleagues:
Adenike M. Lam-Adesina: colleagues
Gareth J. F. Jones: colleagues