Improving the representation of legal case texts with information extraction methods

ABSTRACT

The prohibitive cost of assigning indices to textual cases is a major obstacle for the practical use of AI and Law systems supporting reasoning and arguing with cases. While progress has been made toward extracting certain facts from well-structured case texts or classifying case abstracts under Key Number concepts, these methods still do not suffice for the complexity of indexing concepts in CBR systems.

In this paper, we lay out how a better example representation may facilitate classification-based indexing. Our hypotheses are that (1) abstracting from the individual actors and events in cases, (2) capturing actions in multi-word features, and (3) recognizing negation, can lead to a better representation of legal case texts for automatic indexing. We discuss how to implement these techniques with state-of-the-art NLP tools. Preliminary experimental results suggest that a combination of domain-specific knowledge and information extraction techniques can be used to generalize from the examples and derive more powerful features.

REFERENCES

• 1: Khalid Al-Kofahi , Brian Grom , Peter Jackson, Anaphora resolution in the extraction of treatment history language from court opinions by partial parsing, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.138-146, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway [doi>10.1145/323706.323788]
• 2: Vincent A. W. M. M. Aleven, Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples, 1997
• 3: James Allen, Natural language understanding (2nd ed.), Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1995
• 4: Ashley, K., and Aleven, V. 1997. Reasoning Symbolically about Partially Matched Cases. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 335-341.
• 5: Kevin D. Ashley, Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991
• 6: Branting, L. 1999. Reasoning with Rules and Precedents - A Computational Model of Legal Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• 7: Stefanie Brüninghaus , Kevin D. Ashley, Using Machine Learning for Assigning Indices to Textual Cases, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, p.303-314, July 25-27, 1997
• 8: Stefanie Brüninghaus , Kevin D. Ashley, Toward adding knowledge to learning algorithms for indexing legal cases, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.9-17, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway [doi>10.1145/323706.323709]
• 9: Burton, W. 1992. Legal Thesaurus. Simon &Schuster Macmillan.
• 10: Paul R. Cohen, Empirical methods for artificial intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995
• 11: Jody J. Daniels , Edwina L. Rissland, Finding legally relevant passages in case opinions, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.39-46, June 30-July 03, 1997, Melbourne, Australia [doi>10.1145/261618.261627]
• 12: Jeffrey E. F. Friedl, Mastering regular expressions, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, 1997
• 13: Thorsten Joachims, Text Categorization with Suport Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features, Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Machine Learning, p.137-142, April 21-23, 1998
• 14: Andrew McCallum , Ronald Rosenfeld , Tom M. Mitchell , Andrew Y. Ng, Improving Text Classification by Shrinkage in a Hierarchy of Classes, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, p.359-367, July 24-27, 1998
• 15: Moens, M.-F. 2000. Automatic Indexing and Abstracting of Document Texts. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• 16: Prakken, H., and Sartor, G. 1998. Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6:231-287.
• 17: Ellen Riloff, Little words can make a big difference for text classification, Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.130-136, July 09-13, 1995, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/215206.215349]
• 18: Riloff, E. 1996. Automatically Generating Extraction Patterns from Untagged Text. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1044-1049.
• 19: Rissland, E.; Skalak, D.; and Friedman, T. 1996. BankXX: Supporting Legal Arguments through Heuristic Retrieval. Artificial Intelligence Review 10:1-71.
• 20: Rodale, J. 1978. The Synonym Finder. Warner Books.
• 21: Statski, W. 1985. West's Legal Thesaurus and Dictionary.St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
• 22: Thompson, P., and Dozier, C. 1999. Name Recognition and Retrieval Performance. In Strzalkowski, T., ed., Natural Language Information Retrieval. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 261-272.
• 23: Paul Thompson, Automatic categorization of case law, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.70-77, May 2001, St. Louis, Missouri, United States [doi>10.1145/383535.383543]
• 24: Turtle, H. 1995. Text Retrieval in the Legal Word. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2(1):5-54.
• 25: Voorhees, E. 1998. Using WordNet for Text Retrieval. In Word- Net: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press. 285-303.
• 26: Larry Wall , Tom Christiansen , Randal L. Schwartz , Stephan Potter, Programming Perl (2nd ed.), O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, 1996
• 27: Rosina Weber, Intelligent jurisprudence research: a new concept, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.164-172, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway [doi>10.1145/323706.323791]
• 28: Bokyung Yang-Stephens , M. Charles Swope , Jeffrey Locke , Isabelle Moulinier, Computer-Assisted Classification of Legal Abstracts, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis, p.437-448, August 01, 1997

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Additional Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

General Terms:
Experimentation, Theory