|
ABSTRACT
Constraints are an important aspect of role-based access control (RBAC) and are often regarded as one of the principal motivations behind RBAC. Although the importance of contraints in RBAC has been recogni zed for a long time, they have not recieved much attention. In this article, we introduce an intuitive formal language for specifying role-based authorization constraints named RCL 2000 including its basic elements, syntax, and semantics. We give soundness and completeness proofs for RCL 2000 relative to a restricted form of first-order predicate logic. Also, we show how previously identified role-based authorization constraints such as separtation of duty (SOD) can be expressed in our language. Moreover, we show there are other significant SOD properties that have not been previously identified in the literature. Our work shows that there are many alternate formulations of even the simplest SOD properties, with varying degree of flexibility and assurance. Our language provides us a rigorous foundation for systematic study of role-based authorization constraints.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
GLIGOR,V.D.,GAVRILA, S., AND FERRAIOLO, D. 1998. On the formal definition of separationof-duty policies and their composition. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy (Oakland, CA, May). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 172-183.
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
CITED BY 63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Neely , Helen Lowe , David Eyers , Jean Bacon , Julian Newman , Xiaofeng Gong, An architecture for supporting vicarious learning in a distributed environment, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Applied computing, March 14-17, 2004, Nicosia, Cyprus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy Fraser , David Ferraiolo , Mikel L. Matthews , Casey Schaufler , Stephen Smalley , Robert Watson, Panel: which access control technique will provide the greatest overall benefit, Proceedings of the sixth ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, p.141-149, May 2001, Chantilly, Virginia, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rakesh Bobba , Serban Gavrila , Virgil Gligor , Himanshu Khurana , Radostina Koleva, Administering access control in dynamic coalitions, Proceedings of the 19th conference on Large Installation System Administration Conference, p.23-23, December 04-09, 2005, San Diego, CA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gail-Joon Ahn , Hongxin Hu , Jing Jin, Security-enhanced OSGi service environments, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, v.39 n.5, p.562-571, September 2009
|
|
|
|
|