Is information system a science? an inquiry into the nature of the information systems discipline

ABSTRACT

The information systems (IS) discipline is apparently undergoing an identity crisis. Academicians question the need for IS departments in colleges, stating the absence of a core for the field and its integration within other business functions as a basis for its elimination. At the same time, many practitioners, as reflected in the U.S. government's recent IT labor shortage report, continue to ignore IS as a distinct field of study. This article briefly outlines these and other challenges and argues that notwithstanding underlying philosophical differences, it can be concluded that IS is an emerging scientific discipline. This conclusion is reached through an assessment of the debate surrounding the issue of whether IS should be a discipline and an analysis of the IS discipline using some key characteristics of "science." The arguments put forth in this paper have four key implications for the IS community: a continuing emphasis on adopting scientific principles and practices for conducting inquiry into IS phenomena; an enhancement of the self-concept of IS academics and professionals through a common identity; it enhances the ability of supporters of the IS field to defend against criticisms, integration with other disciplines, and resource rivalry; and it creates the potential of being well-situated to building a cumulative tradition in the field.

REFERENCES

• 1: "America's New Deficit: The Shortage of Information Technology Workers," U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Technology Policy Report, http://www.ta.doc.gov/ Reports.htm (Accessed 19 October 1998).
• 2: C. Avgerou , J. Siemer , N. Bjørn-Andersen, The academic field of information systems in Europe, European Journal of Information Systems, v.8 n.2, p.136-153, June 1999 [doi>10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000319]
• 3: Chrisanthi Avgerou , Tony Cornford, Limitations of information systems theory and practice: a case for pluralism, Proceedings of the IFIP international working conference on Information system concepts: Towards a consolidation of views, p.130-143, March 28-30, 1995
• 4: Claude Banville , Maurice Landry, Can the field of MIS be disciplined?, Communications of the ACM, v.32 n.1, p.48-60, Jan. 1989 [doi>10.1145/63238.63241]
• 5: Izak Benbasat , Robert W. Zmud, Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance, MIS Quarterly, v.23 n.1, p.3-16, March 1999 [doi>10.2307/249403]
• 6: Benbasat, I., and Weber, R. (1996). "Research Commentary: Rethinking 'Diversity'," Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 389-399.
• 7: Blumenthal, H. (1998). "Ready to Get Your Degree in IS? - We Need More IS Grads to Fill the Growing Holes in Corporate Departments," Netscape Enterprise Developer, January, http://www.ne-dev.com/ned-01-1998/ned- 01-enterprise.t.html (Accessed 19 October 1998).
• 8: Boland, R. J., Jr. (1986). "Fantasies in Information Systems," Advances in Public Interest Accounting, pp. 49-65. (cited in Cushing, 1990).
• 9: Burrell, G., and Morgan, G., (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company.
• 10: Peter Checkland , Sue Holwell, Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1998
• 11: Myun J. Cheon , Varun Grover , Rajiv Sabherwal, The evolution of empirical research in IS: a study in IS maturity, Information and Management, v.24 n.3, p.107-119, March 1993 [doi>10.1016/0378-7206(93)90060-7]
• 12: Churchman, C. W. (1971). The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization. New York: Basic Books Inc., Publishers.
• 13: Ciborra, C. U. (1998). "Crisis and Foundations: An Inquiry into the Nature and Limits of Models and Methods in the Information Systems Discipline," Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 5-16.
• 14: Mary J. Culnan, Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980-1985: a co-citation analysis, MIS Quarterly, v.11 n.3, p.341-353, Sept. 1987 [doi>10.2307/248680]
• 15: Mary J Culnan , Burton E Swanson, Research in management information systems, 1980-1984: Points of work and reference, MIS Quarterly, v.10 n.3, p.289-302, Sept. 1986 [doi>10.2307/249263]
• 16: Cushing, B. E. (1990). "Frameworks, Paradigms, and Scientific Research in Management Information Systems," The Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 38-59.
• 17: Davenport, T. (1997). "Storming the Ivory Tower," CIO Magazine, http://www.cio.com/archive /041597_think_content.html (Accessed 29 September 1998).
• 18: Fred D. Davis , Richard P. Bagozzi , Paul R. Warshaw, User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, v.35 n.8, p.982-1003, Aug. 1989 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982]
• 19: Gordon B. Davis , John T. Gorgone , J. Daniel Couger , David L. Feinstein , Herbert E. Longenecker, Jr., IS '97: model curriculum and guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in information systems, ACM SIGMIS Database, v.28 n.1, p.101-194, Winter 1996
• 20: Peter J. Denning , D. E. Comer , David Gries , Michael C. Mulder , Allen Tucker , A. Joe Turner , Paul R. Young, Computing as a discipline, Communications of the ACM, v.32 n.1, p.9-23, Jan. 1989 [doi>10.1145/63238.63239]
• 21: Dickson, G. W., Emery, J. C., Ives, B., King, W. R., and McFarlan, F. W. (1993). "Professional Societies: A Service to Members and Professional Leadership," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. iii-vi.
• 22: Ein-Dor, P., and Segev, E. (1993). "A Classification of Information Systems: Analysis and Interpretation," Information Systems Research , Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 166-204.
• 23: Falkenberg, E. D. et al. (1998). A Framework of Information System Concepts: The FRISCO Report, IFIP, Department of Computer Science, University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
• 24: Falkenberg, E. D., Hesse, W., and Olivé, A. (Editors) (1995). Information Systems Concepts: Towards a Consolidation of Views. London: Chapman & Hall.
• 25: Ali Farhoomand , Don H. Drury, A historiographical examination of information systems, Communications of the AIS, v.1 n.5es, June 1999
• 26: Frankfort-Nachmias, C., and Nachmias, D., (1998). Research Methods in the Social Sciences, (Fifth Edition). St. Martin's Press, Inc.
• 27: Friedman, A. L. (1994). "The Information Technology Field: Using Fields and Paradigms for Analyzing Technological Change," Human Relations, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 367-391.
• 28: Galliers, R. (1997). "Reflections on Information Systems Research: Twelve Points of Debate," in Mingers, J. & Stowell, F. (Eds.) Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? London: McGraw Hill, pp. 141-157.
• 29: Galliers, R. D. (1985), "In Search of a Paradigm for Information Systems Research," in Mumford, E. et al., Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 281-297.
• 30: Sanjay Gosain , Zoonky Lee , Il Im, Topics of interest in IS: comparing academic journals with the practitioner press, Proceedings of the eighteenth international conference on Information systems, p.263-284, December 14-17, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
• 31: Hirschheim, R. A., (1985). "Information Systems Epistemology: A Historical Perspective," in Mumford, E. et al. Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 13-36.
• 32: Hunt, S. D. (1992). "Marketing Is .... " Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 20, Iss. 4, pp. 301-322.
• 33: Hunt, S. D. (1991). Modern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science, Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Company.
• 34: Hunt, S. D. (1983). Marketing Theory: The Philosophy of Marketing Science, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
• 35: Hunt, S. D. (1990). "Truth in Marketing Theory and Research," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 1-16.
• 36: IEEE, (1994). IEEE Software Engineering Standards, Fourth Edition. The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, 1993. (cited in Sanders, J., and Curran, E. Software Quality. A Framework for Success in Software Development and Support, Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley.).
• 37: Ingwersen, P. (1996). "Information and Information Science in Context," in Oliasen, J., Erland, M-P., and Wilson, p., Informing Science: From the Development of the Discipline to Social Interaction, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 69-111.
• 38: L. D. Introna , E. A. Whitley, Imagine: thought experiments in information systems research, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 international conference on Information systems and qualitative research, p.481-496, January 1997, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
• 39: ISWorld Digest, (1999). "Final Comment from Joseph Williams on MISQ and Capstone Journals. Sent to ISWorld by Williams, Joseph. Added: 20-05-1999," The thread of this discussion is available at http://www.http: //www.commerce.uq.edu.au/isworld/announ ce/(Accessed 21st July, 1999).
• 40: Johannessen, J. (1996). "The Cognitive Authority of Information: Information Science, the Theory of Science and Ethics," in Olaisen, J., Erland, M-R, and Wilson, P., Information Science: From the Development of the Discipline to Social Interaction, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 113-134.
• 41: Jones, M. (1997). "It All Depends on What You Mean by Discipline," in Mingers, J., and Stowell, F. (Eds.), Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? London: McGraw Hill, pp. 97-112.
• 42: Kaplan, A. (1964). The Conduct of Inquiry, Scranton, PA: Chandler Publishing Co.
• 43: King, J. L. (1993). "Editorial Notes," Information Systems Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 291-298.
• 44: Klein, H. K., and Lyytinen, K. (1985). "The Poverty of Scientism in Information Systems," in Mumford, E. et al., Research Methods in Information Systems, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 131-161.
• 45: F. Lau, A review on the use of action research in information systems studies, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 international conference on Information systems and qualitative research, p.31-68, January 1997, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
• 46: Kenneth C. Laudon , Jane P. Laudon, Management Information Systems: Organization and Technology, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1995
• 47: Allen S. Lee, Rigor and relevance in MIS research: beyond the approach of positivism alone, MIS Quarterly, v.23 n.1, p.29-33, March 1999 [doi>10.2307/249407]
• 48: Lee, A. S. (1991). "Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research," Organizational Science, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 342-365.
• 49: A. S. Lee , J. Liebenau, Information systems and qualitative research, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 international conference on Information systems and qualitative research, p.1-8, January 1997, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
• 50: Henry C. Lucas, Information Systems Concepts for Management, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1990
• 51: Kalle Lyytinen, Empirical research in information systems: on the relevance of practice in thinking of IS research, MIS Quarterly, v.23 n.1, p.25-27, March 1999 [doi>10.2307/249406]
• 52: Kalle Lyytinen, Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.19 n.1, p.5-46, March 1987 [doi>10.1145/28865.28867]
• 53: Markus, M. L. (1999). "Thinking the Unthinkable: What Happens if the IS Field as We Know it Goes Away?" Claremont Graduate School, 1996. Also now published in W. Currie and R. Galliers (Eds.), Rethinking MIS, UK: Oxford University Press.
• 54: Merriam-Webster OnLine, http://www.m-w.com/ (Accessed October 10th, 1998).
• 55: Frank Stowell , John Mingers, Information Systems an Emerging Discipline, McGraw Hill Text, 2004
• 56: Morgan, G. (1983). Beyond Method. Strategies for Social Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• 57: Mumford, E., Fitzgerald, G., Hirschheim, R. A., and Wood-Harper, A. T. (1985). "Information Systems Research Methodology: An Introduction to the Debate," in Mumford, E. et al., Research Methods in Information Systems, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 3-9.
• 58: Olaisen, J., Erland, M-P., and Wilson, R (1996). Information Science: From the Development of the Discipline to Social Interaction, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
• 59: Orlikowski, W. J., and Baroudi, J. J. (1991). "Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-28.
• 60: Rand, H. (1998). "Science, Non-Science, and Nonsense," Vital Speeches of the Day, Vol. 64, No. 9, pp. 282-284.
• 61: Robey, D. (1996). "Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility," Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 400-408.
• 62: Carol Saunders, The role of business in IT research, Information Resources Management Journal, v.11 n.1, p.4-6, Dec. 1998
• 63: Swanson, E. W., and Ramiller, N. C. (1993). "Information Systems Research Thematics: Submissions to a New Journal, 1987-1992," Information Systems Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 299-358.
• 64: "The Physical Sciences: Physics: Relations between Physics and other Disciplines and Society: Influence of Related Disciplines on Physics," Britannica Online, http://www.eb. com:180/cgi-bin/g?DocF=macro/50055/42 .html (Accessed 19 October 1998).
• 65: Trauth, E. M., Farwell, D. W., and Lee, D. (1993). "The IS Expectation Gap: Industry Expectations Versus Academic Preparation," MIS Quarterly, pp. 293-303.
• 66: Walsham, G. (1995a). "Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 4, pp. 74-81.
• 67: Walsham, G. (1995b). "The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research," Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 376-394.
• 68: Geoff Walsham, Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1993
• 69: Hugh J. Watson , Kenneth P. Taylor , Guy Higgins , Chris Kadlec , Michael Meeks, Leaders assess the current state of the academic IS discipline, Communications of the AIS, v.2 n.1es, July 1999
• 70: Whitley, R. (1984). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

INDEX TERMS

Classification:
  H. Information Systems

General Terms:
Design, Management, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
characteristics of scientific fields, information systems discipline, philosophy of science, scientific inquiry