ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Distributed multi-hop scheduling and medium access with delay and throughput constraints
Full text PdfPdf (259 KB)
Source International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking archive
Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking table of contents
Rome, Italy
Pages: 200 - 209  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-422-3
Authors
V. Kanodia  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University
C. Li  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University
A. Sabharwal  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University
B. Sadeghi  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University
E. Knightly  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University
Sponsor
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 127,   Citation Count: 27
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/381677.381697
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Providing quality of service in random access multi-hop wireless networks requires support from both medium access and packet scheduling algorithms. However, due to the distributed nature of ad hoc networks, nodes may not be able to determine the next packet that would be transmitted in a (hypothetical) centralized and ideal dynamic priority scheduler. In this paper, we develop two mechanisms for QoS communication in multi-hop wireless networks. First, we devise distributed priority scheduling a technique that piggybacks the priority tag of a node's head-of-line packet onto handshake and data packets; e.g., RTS/DATA packets in IEEE 802.11. By monitoring transmitted packets, each node maintains a scheduling table which is used to assess the node's priority level relative to other nodes. We then incorporate this scheduling table into existing IEEE 802.11 priority back-off schemes to approximate the idealized schedule. Second, we observe that congestion, link errors, and the random nature of medium access prohibit an exact realization of the ideal schedule. Consequently, we devise a scheduling scheme termedmulti-hop coordinationso that downstream nodes can increase a packet's relative priority to make up for excessive delays incurred upstream. We next develop a simple analytical model to quantitatively explore these two mechanisms. In the former case, we study the impact of the probability of overhearing another packet's priority index on the scheme's ability to achieve the ideal schedule. In the latter case, we explore the role of multi-hop coordination in increasing the probability that a packet satisfies its end-to-end QoS target. Finally, we perform a set of ns-2 simulations to study the scheme's performance under more realistic conditions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
I. Aad and C. Castelluccia. Differentiation mechanisms for IEEE 802.11. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'01, Anchorage, Alaska, April 2001.
 
2
M. Andrews and L. Zhang. Minimizing end-to-end delay in high-speed networks with a simple coordinated schedule. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '99, New York, NY, March 1999.
 
3
 
4
P. Bhagwat, P. Bhattacharya, A. Krishna, and S. Tripathi. Enhancing throughput over wireless LANs using channel state dependent packet scheduling. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'96, San Francisco, CA, March 1996.
 
5
G. Bianchi. Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(3):535-547, March 2000.
6
 
7
IEEE. IEEE standard 802.11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications, 1997.
 
8
D. Johnson and D. Maltz. Mobile Computing, chapter Dynamic source routing in Ad Hoc wireless networks. Kluwer Academic, 1996.
 
9
 
10
 
11
12
13
 
14
T. Ng, I. Stoica, and H. Zhang. Packet fair queueing algorithms for wireless networks with location dependent errors. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'98, San Francisco, CA, May 1998.
 
15
 
16
 
17
S. Shenker. Fundamental design issues for the future Internet. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13(7):1176-1188, September 1995.
18
 
19
N. Vaidya and P. Bahl. Fair scheduling in broadcast environments, August 1999. Microsoft Research Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-99-61.
20
 
21
L. Zhang. A New Architecture for Packet Switched Network Protocols. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, July 1989.

CITED BY  27

Collaborative Colleagues:
V. Kanodia: colleagues
C. Li: colleagues
A. Sabharwal: colleagues
B. Sadeghi: colleagues
E. Knightly: colleagues