|
ABSTRACT
par>We prove some non-approximability results for restrictions of basic combinatorial optimization problems to instances of bounded “degree&r dquo;or bounded “width.” Specifically:We prove that the Max 3SAT problem on instances where each variable occurs in at most B clauses, is hard to approximate to within a factor $7/8 + O(1/\sqrt{B})$, unless $RP = NP$. H\aa stad [18] proved that the problem is approximable to within a factor $7/8 + 1/64B$ in polynomial time, and that is hard to approximate to within a factor $7/8 +1/(\log B)^{&OHgr;(1)}$. Our result uses a new randomized reduction from general instances of Max 3SAT to bounded-occurrences instances. The randomized reduction applies to other Max SNP problems as well.We observe that the Set Cover problem on instances where each set has size at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor $\ln B - O(\ln\ln B)$ unless $P=NP$. The result follows from an appropriate setting of parameters in Feige's reduction [11]. This is essentially tight in light of the existence of $(1+\ln B)$-approximate algorithms [20, 23, 9]We present a new PCP construction, based on applying parallel repetition to the ``inner verifier,'' and we provide a tight analysis for it. Using the new construction, and some modifications to known reductions from PCP to Hitting Set, we prove that Hitting Set with sets of size B is hard to approximate to within a factor $B^{1/19}$. The problem can be approximated to within a factor B [19], and it is the Vertex Cover problem for B=2. The relationship between hardness of approximation and set size seems to have not been explored before. We observe that the Independent Set problem on graphs having degree at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor $B/2^{O(sqrt{\log B})}$, unless P = NP. This follows from a comination of results by Clementi and Trevisan [28] and Reingold, Vadhan and Wigderson [27]. It had been observed that the problem is hard to approximate to within a factor $B^{&OHgr; (1)}$ unless P=NP [1]. An algorithm achieving factor $O (B)$ is also known [21, 2, 30, 16}.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
N. Alon and J. Spencer. The Probabilistic Method. Wiley Interscience, 1992.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
M. Bellare , S. Goldwasser , C. Lund , A. Russeli, Efficient probabilistically checkable proofs and applications to approximations, Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, p.294-304, May 16-18, 1993, San Diego, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/167088.167174]
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
V. Chvatal. A greedy heuristic for the set-covering problem. Mathematics of Operations Research, 4:233-235, 1979.
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
Oded Goldreich , R. L. Graham , B. Korte, Modern Cryptography, Probabilistic Proofs, and Pseudorandomness, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 1998
|
| |
14
|
V. Guruswami. Query-efficient checking of proofs and improved PCP characterizations of NP. Master Thesis, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, 1999.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
D. Hochbaum. Approximation algorithms for set covering and vertex cover problems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 11:555-556, 1982.
|
| |
20
|
D.S. Johnson. Approximation algorithms for combinatorial problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 9:256-278, 1974.
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
L. Lovasz. On the ratio of optimal integral and fractional covers. Discrete Mathematics, 13:383-390, 1975.
|
 |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
Christos Papadimitriou , Mihalis Yannakakis, Optimization, approximation, and complexity classes, Proceedings of the twentieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, p.229-234, May 02-04, 1988, Chicago, Illinois, United States
[doi> 10.1145/62212.62233]
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
|
 |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
|
| |
30
|
S. Vishwanathan. Personal communication to M. Halldorsson. Cited in {16}, 1996.
|
CITED BY 23
|
|
Irit Dinur , Venkatesan Guruswami , Subhash Khot , Oded Regev, A new multilayered PCP and the hardness of hypergraph vertex cover, Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, June 09-11, 2003, San Diego, CA, USA
|
|
|
Reuven Bar-Yehuda , Magnús M. Halldórsson , Joseph (Seffi) Naor , Hadas Shachnai , Irina Shapira, Scheduling split intervals, Proceedings of the thirteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, p.732-741, January 06-08, 2002, San Francisco, California
|
|
|
|
|
|
Devdatt Dubhashi , Alessandro Mei , Alessandro Panconesi , Jaikumar Radhakrishnan , Arvind Srinivasan, Fast distributed algorithms for (weakly) connected dominating sets and linear-size skeletons, Proceedings of the fourteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, January 12-14, 2003, Baltimore, Maryland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Samorodnitsky , Luca Trevisan, Gowers uniformity, influence of variables, and PCPs, Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, May 21-23, 2006, Seattle, WA, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erik D. Demaine , Mohammad Ghodsi , Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi , Amin S. Sayedi-Roshkhar , Morteza Zadimoghaddam, Scheduling to minimize gaps and power consumption, Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures, June 09-11, 2007, San Diego, California, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|