ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The open archives initiative (panel session): perspectives on metadata harvesting
Full text PdfPdf (64 KB)
Source International Conference on Digital Libraries archive
Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries table of contents
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Page: 49  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-345-6
Authors
James B. Lloyd  University of Tennessee
Tim Cole  Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Mathematics Library
Donald Waters  Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
Caroline Arms  Library of Congress
Simeon Warner  Los Alamos National Laboratory
Jeffrey Young  OCLC Online Computer Library Center
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 13,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/379437.379446
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Open Archives Initiative [www.openarchives.org] has developed a me tadata harvesting protocol to further its aim of efficient dissemination of content through interoperability standards. In early 2001, at meetings in the U.S. and Europe, the version of the protocol to be used for beta testing was announced. The HTTP-based protocol uses URLs for queries and XML for responses. The default metadata record structure is unqualified Dublin Core using a specified XML Schema. This simple metadata record form is intended to support cross-domain discovery; other record structures for which XML Schemas are defined can also be made available. Developments during the beta test should include the creation of OAI-compliant repositories (data providers) and harvesters (service providers). This panel will explore the purpose and evolution of the Open Archives Initiative from the point of view of various stakeholders, with emphasis on developments during 2001.



Collaborative Colleagues:
James B. Lloyd: colleagues
Tim Cole: colleagues
Donald Waters: colleagues
Caroline Arms: colleagues
Simeon Warner: colleagues
Jeffrey Young: colleagues