ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Climbing the smalltalk mountain
Full text PdfPdf (437 KB)
Source ACM SIGCHI Bulletin archive
Volume 21 ,  Issue 3  (January 1990) table of contents
Page: 76  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISSN:0736-6906
Authors
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 10,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/379088.379101
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Part of the promise of object-oriented software technology - and much of the fascination with objected-orientedness -- stems from its psychological implications. Thinking in terms of objects sending and responding to messages is supposed to be more "natural" than thinking of various data structures being operated on by generic procedures. Programming by using or specializing existent objects and their methods is supposed to make code reuse accessible even to beginners.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J. and Austin, G. A. (1956). <i>A study of thinking</i>. New York: Wiley.
 
2
 
3
O'Shea, T. (1986). Panel: The learnability of object-oriented programming systems. In N. Meyrowitz (Ed.), <i>Object-oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA'86) Conference Proceedings</i> (502--504). New York: ACM.

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mary Beth Rosson: colleagues
John M. Carroll: colleagues