ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A stop list for general text
Full text PdfPdf (560 KB)
Source ACM SIGIR Forum archive
Volume 24 ,  Issue 1-2  (Fall 89/Winter 90) table of contents
Pages: 19 - 21  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISSN:0163-5840
Author
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27,   Downloads (12 Months): 151,   Citation Count: 18
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/378881.378888
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A stop list, or negative dictionary is a device used in automatic indexing to filter out words that would make poor index terms. Traditionally stop lists are supposed to have included only the most frequently occurring words. In practice, however, stop lists have tended to include infrequently occurring words, and have not included many frequently occurring words. Infrequently occurring words seem to have been included because stop list compilers have not, for whatever reason, consulted empirical studies of word frequencies. Frequently occurring words seem to have been left out for the same reason, and also because many of them might still be important as index terms.This paper reports an exercise in generating a stop list for general text based on the Brown corpus of 1,014,000 words drawn from a broad range of literature in English. We start with a list of tokens occurring more than 300 times in the Brown corpus. From this list of 278 words, 32 are culled on the grounds that they are too important as potential index terms. Twenty-six words are then added to the list in the belief that they may occur very frequently in certain kinds of literature. Finally, 149 words are added to the list because the finite state machine based filter in which this list is intended to be used is able to filter them at almost no cost. The final product is a list of 421 stop words that should be maximally efficient and effective in filtering the most frequently occurring and semantically neutral words in general literature in English.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Luhn, H. P., "A Statistical Approach to Mechanized Encoding and Searching of Literary Information," <i>IBM Journal of Research and Development</i> 1(4), October, 1957.
 
3
Francis, W. Nelson, and Henry, Kucera, <i>Frequency Analysis of English Usage</i>, Houghton Mifflin, 1982.
 
4

CITED BY  18