ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A randomized art-gallery algorithm for sensor placement
Full text PdfPdf (324 KB)
Source Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the seventeenth annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
Medford, Massachusetts, United States
Pages: 232 - 240  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-357-X
Author
H. González-Banos  CS Robotics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 64,   Citation Count: 15
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/378583.378674
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper descirbes a placement strategy to compute a set of “good” locations where visual sensing will be most effective. Throughout this paper it is assumed that a {\em polygonal 2-D map} of a workspace is given as input. This polygonal map --- also known as a {\em floor plan} of {\em layout} --- is used to compute a set of locations where expensive sensing tasks (such as 3-D image acquisition) could be executed. A map-building robot, for example, can visit these locations in order to build a full 3-D model of the workspace. The sensor placement strategy relies on a randomized algorithm that solves a variant of the {\em art-gallery problem}-\cite{Oro87, She92, Urr97} : Find the minimum set of guards inside a polygonal workspace from which the entire workspace boundary is visibe. To better take into account the limitations of physical sensors, the algorithm computes a set of guards that satisfies incidence and range constraints. Although the computed set of guards is not guaranteed to have minimum size, the algorithm does compute with high probability a set whose size is at most a factor $\big0{ (n + h) \cot \log(c \ (n + h) )$ from the optimal size$c$, where $n$ is the number of edges in the input polygonal map and $n$ the number of obstacles in its interior (holes).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J.E. Banta, Y. Zhien, X.Z. Wang, G. Zhang, M.T. Smith, and M.A. Abidi. A "next-best-view" algorithm for three-dimensional scene reconstruction using range images. In SPIE, volume 2588, pages 418-29, 1995.
 
2
 
3
H. Br.onnimann, B. Chazelle, and J. Matousek. Product range spaces, sensitive sampling, and derandomization. In Proc. of 34th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 400-409, 1993.
 
4
H. Bronnimann and M.T. Goodrich. Almost optimal set covers in finite vc-dimension. Discrete and Computational Geometry, 14:463-479, 1995.
 
5
C. I. Conolly. The determination of next best views. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 432-435, 1985.
 
6
7
 
8
T. Danner and L. Kavraki. Randomized planning for short inspection paths. In Proc. 2000 IEEE Int'l Conf. Robotics & and Automation, pages 971-976, April 2000.
 
9
H. Gonzalez-Banos, A. Efrat, J.C. Latombe, E. Mao, and T.M. Murali. Planning robot motion strategies for efficient model construction. In J. Hollerbach and D. Koditschek, editors, Robotics Research - The Ninth Int. Symp., Salt Lake City, UT, 1999. Springer-Verlag.
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
R. Pito. A solution to the next best view problem for automated cad model acquisition of free-form objects using range cameras. Technical Report 95-23, GRASP Lab, University ofPennsylvania, May 1995.
 
15
T. Shermer. Recent results in art galleries. Proc. IEEE, 80(9):1384-1399, September 1992.
 
16
 
17
18
 
19
Jorge Urrutia. Art gallery and illumination problems. In J. R. Sack and J. Urrutia, editors, Hanbook on Computational Geometry, pages 387-434. Elsevier Science Publishers, 1997.
 
20
L. Wixson. Viewpoint selection for visual search. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 800-805, 1994.

CITED BY  15