|
ABSTRACT
This paper descirbes a placement strategy to compute a set of “good” locations where visual sensing will be most effective. Throughout this paper it is assumed that a {\em polygonal 2-D map} of a workspace is given as input. This polygonal map --- also known as a {\em floor plan} of {\em layout} --- is used to compute a set of locations where expensive sensing tasks (such as 3-D image acquisition) could be executed. A map-building robot, for example, can visit these locations in order to build a full 3-D model of the workspace.
The sensor placement strategy relies on a randomized algorithm that solves a variant of the {\em art-gallery problem}-\cite{Oro87, She92, Urr97} : Find the minimum set of guards inside a polygonal workspace from which the entire workspace boundary is visibe. To better take into account the limitations of physical sensors, the algorithm computes a set of guards that satisfies incidence and range constraints. Although the computed set of guards is not guaranteed to have minimum size, the algorithm does compute with high probability a set whose size is at most a factor $\big0{ (n + h) \cot \log(c \ (n + h) )$ from the optimal size$c$, where $n$ is the number of edges in the input polygonal map and $n$ the number of obstacles in its interior (holes).
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
J.E. Banta, Y. Zhien, X.Z. Wang, G. Zhang, M.T. Smith, and M.A. Abidi. A "next-best-view" algorithm for three-dimensional scene reconstruction using range images. In SPIE, volume 2588, pages 418-29, 1995.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
H. Br.onnimann, B. Chazelle, and J. Matousek. Product range spaces, sensitive sampling, and derandomization. In Proc. of 34th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 400-409, 1993.
|
| |
4
|
H. Bronnimann and M.T. Goodrich. Almost optimal set covers in finite vc-dimension. Discrete and Computational Geometry, 14:463-479, 1995.
|
| |
5
|
C. I. Conolly. The determination of next best views. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 432-435, 1985.
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
T. Danner and L. Kavraki. Randomized planning for short inspection paths. In Proc. 2000 IEEE Int'l Conf. Robotics & and Automation, pages 971-976, April 2000.
|
| |
9
|
H. Gonzalez-Banos, A. Efrat, J.C. Latombe, E. Mao, and T.M. Murali. Planning robot motion strategies for efficient model construction. In J. Hollerbach and D. Koditschek, editors, Robotics Research - The Ninth Int. Symp., Salt Lake City, UT, 1999. Springer-Verlag.
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
R. Pito. A solution to the next best view problem for automated cad model acquisition of free-form objects using range cameras. Technical Report 95-23, GRASP Lab, University ofPennsylvania, May 1995.
|
| |
15
|
T. Shermer. Recent results in art galleries. Proc. IEEE, 80(9):1384-1399, September 1992.
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
Jorge Urrutia. Art gallery and illumination problems. In J. R. Sack and J. Urrutia, editors, Hanbook on Computational Geometry, pages 387-434. Elsevier Science Publishers, 1997.
|
| |
20
|
L. Wixson. Viewpoint selection for visual search. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 800-805, 1994.
|
CITED BY 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yongguo Mei , Changjiu Xian , Saumitra Das , Y. Charlie Hu , Yung-Hsiang Lu, Sensor replacement using mobile robots, Computer Communications, v.30 n.13, p.2615-2626, September, 2007
|
|
|
Bilge Mutlu , Andreas Krause , Jodi Forlizzi , Carlos Guestrin , Jessica Hodgins, Robust, low-cost, non-intrusive sensing and recognition of seated postures, Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, October 07-10, 2007, Newport, Rhode Island, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|