ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Finding large independent sets of hypergraphs in parallel
Full text PdfPdf (248 KB)
Source ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures archive
Proceedings of the thirteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures table of contents
Crete Island, Greece
Pages: 163 - 168  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-409-6
Authors
Hadas Shachnai  Department of Computer Science, The Technion IIT, Haifa 32000, Israel
Aravind Srinivasan  Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, 600-700 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, NJ
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/378580.378622
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A basic problem in hypergraphs is that of finding a large independent set-one of guaranteed size-in a given hypergraph. Understanding the parallel complexity of this and related independent set problems on hypergraphs is a fundamental open issue in parallel computation. Caro and Tuza (J. Graph Theory, Vol. 15, pp. 99-107, 1991) have shown a certain lower bound &agr;k(H) on the size of a maximum independent set in a given k-uniform hypergraph H, and have also presented an efficien sequential algorithm to find an independent set of size &agr;k (H). They also show that &agr;k (H) is the size of the maximum independent set for various hypergraph families. Here, we develop the first RNC algorithm to find an independent set of size &agr;k(H), and also derandomize it for various special cases. We also present lower bounds on independent set size and corresponding RNC algorithms for non-uniform hypergraphs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
N. Alon and M. Naor. Derandomization, witnesses for Boolean matrix multiplication and construction of perfect hash functions. Algorithmica, 16:434-449, 1996.
 
3
N. Alon and J. H. Spencer. The Probabilistic Method. Wiley-Interscience, 1992.
 
4
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
C. M. Fortuin, J. Ginibre, P. N. Kasteleyn, Correlational Inequalities for Partially Ordered Sets, Communications of Mathematical Physics, 22,pp. 89-103, 1971.
 
9
 
10
 
11
M. Hofri. Analysis of Algorithms. Oxford University Press, 1995.
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
16
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
R. J. McEliece and K. N. Sivarajan. Performance limits for channelized cellular telephone systems. IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, 40(1):21-34, 1994.
 
21
 
22
 
23
J. H. Spencer. The probabilistic lens: Sperner, Turan and Bregman revisited. In A Tribute to Paul Erdos (A. Baker, B. Bollobas, A. Hajnal, Eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 391-396, 1990.
 
24
 
25
E. Szymanska. Derandomization of a Parallel MIS Algorithm in a Linear Hypergraph. In Proc. Fourth International Workshop on Randomization and Approximation Techniques in Computer Science, pages 39-52, 2000.
 
26
P. Turan. On the theory of graphs. Colloq. Math., 3, pp. 19-30, 1954.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hadas Shachnai: colleagues
Aravind Srinivasan: colleagues