ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On-chip communication architecture for OC-768 network processors
Full text PdfPdf (245 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 38th annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Pages: 678 - 683  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-297-2
Authors
Faraydon Karim  STMicroelectronics Inc., Central R&D, San Diego, CA
Anh Nguyen  STMicroelectronics Inc., Central R&D, San Diego, CA
Sujit Dey  Univ. of CA, San Diego, Dept. of Electrical Eng., La Jolla, CA
Ramesh Rao  Univ. of CA, San Diego, Dept. of Electrical Eng., La Jolla, CA
Sponsors
EDAC : Electronic Design Automation Consortium
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 48,   Citation Count: 31
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/378239.379047
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The need for network processors capable of forwarding IP packets at OC-192 and higher data rates has been well established. At the same time, there is a growing need for complex tasks, like packet classification and differentiated services, to be performed by network processors. At OC-768 data rate, a network processor has 9 nanoseconds to process a minimum-size IP packet. Such ultra high-speed processing, involving complex memory-intensive tasks, can only be achieved by multi-CPU distributed memory systems, using very high performance on-chip communication architectures. In this paper, we propose a novel communication network architecture for 8-CPU distributed-memory systems that has the potential to deliver the throughput required in next generation routers. We then show that our communication architecture can easily scale to accommodate much greater number of network nodes. Our network architecture yields higher performance than the traditional bus and crossbar yet has low implementation cost. It is quite flexible and can be implemented in either packet or circuit switched mode. We will compare and contrast our proposed architecture with busses and crossbars using metrics such as throughput and physical layout cost.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Kumar, V.P.; Lakshman, T.V.; Stiliadis, D., "Beyond best effort: router architectures for the differentiated services of tomorrow's Internet," IEEE Communications Magazine, Volume: 36 Issue: 5 , May 1998, pp. 152 - 164.
 
2
F. Karim, "Network Processors: The New Frontier in SoC Design and Validation," Presentation, DATE conference, 2000.
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
8
9
10
11
12
 
13
 
14
"IBM On-chip CoreConnect Bus Architecture", http://www.chips.ibm.com/products/coreconnect/index.h tml
 
15
"Peripheral Interconnect Bus Architecture", http://www.omimo.be
 
16
"Sonics Integration Architecture, Sonics Inc", http://www.sonicsinc.com
 
17
B. Cordan, "An efficient bus architecture for system-on-achip design", Proc. Custom Integrated Circuits Conf., pp. 623-626, 1999.
 
18
 
19
"On chip bus attributes specification 1 OCB 1 1.0, Onchip bus DWG", http://www.vsi.org/library/specs/summary.htm
 
20
Chen, J. and Stern, T., "Throughput Analysis, Optimal Buffer Allocation, and Traffic Imbalance Study of a Generic Nonblocking Packet Switch, IEEE JSAC, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1991, pp. 439-449.
 
21
Cinlar, E., Introduction to Stochastic Processes, pp. 87- 88, Prentice Hall, 1975.
 
22
 
23

CITED BY  31

Collaborative Colleagues:
Faraydon Karim: colleagues
Anh Nguyen: colleagues
Sujit Dey: colleagues
Ramesh Rao: colleagues