ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Future performance challenges in nanometer design
Full text PdfPdf (253 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 38th annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Pages: 3 - 8  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-297-2
Authors
Sponsors
EDAC : Electronic Design Automation Consortium
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 48,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/378239.378245
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We highlight several fundamental challenges to designing high-performance integrated circuits in nanometer-scale technologies (i.e. draRita Glover, EDA Today, L.C.wn feature sizes< 100 nm). Dynamic power scaling trends lead to major packaging problems. To alleviate these concerns, tMarc Halpernhermal monitoring and feedback mechanisms can limit worst-case dissipation and reduce costs. Furthermore, a flexible multi-Vdd + multi-Vth + re-sizing approach is advocated to leverage the inherent properties of ultra-small MOSFETs and limit both dynamic and static power. Alternative global signaling strategies such as differential and low-swing drivers are recommended in order to curb the power requirements of cross-chip communication. Finally, potential power delivery challenges are addressed with respect to ITRS packaging predictions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Y. Cao, et al., "New paradigm of predictive MOSFET and interconnect modeling for early circuit simulation," Proc. CICC, pp. 201-204, 2000.
 
3
Personal communication, Pin Su & Charles Kuo.
 
4
R. Viswanath, et al., "Thermal performance challenges from silicon to systems," Intel Technology Journal, 3 rd quarter, 2000.
 
5
I. Aller, et al., "CMOS circuit technology for sub-ambient temperature operation," Proc. ISSCC, pp. 214-215, 2000.
 
6
 
7
S.H. Gunther, et al., "Managing the impact of increasing microprocessor power consumption," Intel Technology Journal, 1 st quarter, 2001.
8
9
 
10
11
 
12
 
13
Y. Massoud, et al., "Differential signaling in crosstalk avoidance strategies for physical synthesis," Proc. TAU, 2000.
14
15
 
16
IBM SA-27E ASIC standard cell datasheet.
 
17
P. Hurat, "Beyond physical synthesis," SNUG Europe 2001.
 
18
K. Usami, et al., "Automated low-power technique exploiting multiple supply voltages applied to a media processor," IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., pp. 463-472, Mar. 1998.
 
19
M. Takahashi, et al., "A 60-mW MPEG4 video codec using clustered voltage scaling with variable supply-voltage scheme," IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., pp. 1772-1780, Nov. 1998.
20
 
21
C. Akrout, et al, "A 480MHz RISC microprocessor in a 0.12....m Leff CMOS technology with copper interconnects," IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., pp. 1609- 1616, Nov. 1998.
22
 
23
 
24
R. Chau, et al., "30nm physical gate length CMOS transistors with 1.0ps NMOS and 1.7ps PMOS gate delays," Proc. IEDM, pp. 45-48, 2000.
 
25
S. Song, et al., "CMOS device scaling beyond 100nm," Proc. IEDM, pp. 235- 238, 2000.
 
26
H. Wakabayashi, et al., "45-nm gate length CMOS technology and beyond using steep halo," Proc. IEDM, pp. 49-52, 2000.
 
27
M.Mehrotra, et al., "A 1.2V, sub-0.09~m gate length CMOS technology," Proc. IEDM, pp. 419-422, 1999.
 
28
I.Y. Yang, et al., "Sub-60nm physical gate length SOI CMOS," Proc. IEDM, pp. 431-434, 1999.
 
29
A. Ono, et al., "A 70nm gate length CMOS technology with 1.0V operation," VLSI Symp. Tech., pp. 14-15, 2000.
 
30
M. Rodder, et al., "A scaled 1.8V, 0.18~m gate length CMOS technology: device design and reliability considerations," Proc IEDM, pp. 415-418, 1995.
 
31
L. Su, et al, "A high-performance 0.08~m CMOS," VLSI Symp. Tech., pp. 12- 13, 1996.
 
32
K. Chen and C. Hu, "Performance and Vdd scaling in deep submicrometer CMOS," IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., pp. 1586-1589, Oct. 1998.
 
33
C. Hu, "Device and technology impact on low power electronics," in Low Power Design Methodologies, ed. Jan Rabaey, Kluwer, pp. 21-35, 1996.
 
34
S. Mutoh, et al., "1V Multi-Threshold CMOS DSP with an efficient power management technique for mobile phone application", Proc. ISSCC, pp. 168- 169, 1996.
 
35
J.T. Kao and A.P. Chandrakasan, "Dual-threshold voltage techniques for lowpower digital circuits," IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., pp. 1009-1018, Jul. 2000.
 
36
T. Kuroda, et al., "A 0.9V, 150MHz, 10mW, 4mm 2 , 2-DCT core processor with variable VT scheme," IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., pp. 1770-1778, Nov. 1996.
 
37
H. Kawaguchi, et al., "A CMOS scheme for 0.5V supply voltage with picoampere standby current," Proc. ISSCC, pp. 192-193, 1998.
38
 
39
 
40
S. Tyagi, et al., "A 130nm generation logic technology featuring 70nm transistors, dual-Vt transistors and 6 layers of Cu interconnects," Proc. IEDM, pp. 567- 570, 2000.
 
41
42

CITED BY  9

Collaborative Colleagues:
Dennis Sylvester: colleagues
Himanshu Kaul: colleagues