ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The character, value, and management of personal paper archives
Full text PdfPdf (138 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) archive
Volume 8 ,  Issue 2  (June 2001) table of contents
Pages: 150 - 170  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISSN:1073-0516
Authors
Steve Whittaker  AT&T Labs, Florham Park, NJ
Julia Hirschberg  AT&T Labs, Florham Park, NJ
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 159,   Citation Count: 28
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/376929.376932
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We explored general issues concerning personal information management by investigating the characteristics of office workers' paper-based information, in an industrial research environment. we examined the reasons people collect paper, types of data they collect, problems encountered in handling paper, and strategies used for processing it. We tested three specific hypotheses in the course of an office move. The greater availability of public digital data along with changes in people's jobs or interests should lead to wholescale discarding of paper data, while preparing for the move. Instead we found workers kept large, highly valued papar archives. We also expected that the major part of people's personal archives would be unique documents. However, only 49% of people's archives were unique documents, the remainder being copies of publicly available data and unread information, and we explore reasons for this. We examined the effects of paper-processing strategies on archive structure. We discovered different paper-processing strategies (filing and piling)that were relatively independent of job type. We predicated that filers' attempted to evaluate and catergorize incoming documents would produce smaller archives that were accessed frequently. Contrary to our predictions, filers amassed more information, and accessed it less frequently than pilers. We argue that filers may engage in premature filing: to clear their workspace, they archives information that later turns out to be of low value. Given the effort involved in organzing data, they are also loath to discard filed information, even when its value is uncertain. We discuss the implications of this research for digital personal information management.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
 
5
COLE, I. 1981. Human aspects of office filing: Implications for the electronic office. In Proceedings of Human Factors (Seattle, Wa.).
6
7
 
8
FRANCIK, E. 1996. Rapid integrated design of a multimedia communication system. In Human Computer Interface Design, M. Rudishill, Ed. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
 
9
FROHLICH,D.AND PERRY, M. 1994. The Paperful Office Paradox. Hewlett Packard Laboratories Tech. Rep. HPL-94-20.
10
11
 
12
HARRIS,J.E.AND MORRIS, P. E., Eds. 1984. Everyday Memory, Actions, and Absent-Mindedness. Academic Press, London.
13
14
 
15
 
16
JOHNSON, A. 1997. Fax trends. Office Equipment and Products 25.
17
18
 
19
LANSDALE, M. 1988. The psychology of personal information management. Applied Ergonomics 19, 55-66.
 
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
 
28
RHODES,B.AND STARNER, T. 1996. The Remembrance Agent: A continuously running automated information retrieval system. In Proceedings of The First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi Agent Technology (PAAM'96). 487-495.
29
 
30
31
 
32
SHAPIRO, D., HUGHES, J., RANDALL,D.,AND HARPER, R. 1991. Visual representation of the flight data strip in air traffic control. Proceedings of the 10th Interdisciplinary Workshop on Informatics and Psychology.
 
33
 
34
SHNEIDERMAN, B. 1982. The future of interactive systems and the emergence of direct manipulation. Behavior and Information technology 1, 237-256.
 
35
 
36
TUSHMAN, M. 1977. Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly 22, 587-605.
 
37
 
38
39
40
41
42
43
 
44

CITED BY  28


REVIEW

"Jack Noel Rose : Reviewer"

Whittaker and Hirschberg have written about issues in personal information management, in light of an era of paperwork reduction. They studied the reasons people collect different types of paper documents, and related behaviors concerning the  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Steve Whittaker: colleagues
Julia Hirschberg: colleagues