ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Entropy and self-organization in multi-agent systems
Full text PdfPdf (276 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents table of contents
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Pages: 124 - 130  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-326-X
Authors
H. Van Dyke Parunak  ERIM, PO Box 134001, Ann Arbor, MI
Sven Brueckner  ERIM, PO Box 134001, Ann Arbor, MI
Sponsor
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27,   Downloads (12 Months): 128,   Citation Count: 17
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/375735.376024
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Emergent self-organization in multi-agent systems appears to contradict the second law of thermodynamics. This paradox has been explained in terms of a coupling between the macro level that hosts self-organization (and an apparent reduction in entropy), and the micro level (where random processes greatly increase entropy). Metaphorically, the micro level serves as an entropy “sink”, permitting overall system entropy to increase while sequestering this increase from the interactions where selforganization is desired. We make this metaphor precise by constructing a simple example of pheromone-based coordination, defining a way to measure the Shannon entropy at the macro (agent) and micro (pheromone) levels, and exhibiting an entropybased view of the coordination.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
S. Brueckner. Return from the Ant: Synthetic Ecosystems for Manufacturing Control. Thesis at Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Computer Science, 2000.
 
3
E. Fredkin. Finite Nature. In Proceedings of The XXVIIth Recontre de Moriond, 1992.
 
4
P.-P. Grasse. La Reconstruction du nid et les Coordinations Inter-Individuelles chez Bellicositermes Natalensis et Cubitermes sp. La theorie de la Stigmergie: Essai d'interpretation du Comportement des Termites Constructeurs. Insectes Sociaux, 6:41-80, 1959.
 
5
H. A. Gutowitz. Complexity-Seeking Ants. In Proceedings of Third European Conference on Artifical Life, 1993.
 
6
B. Hayes. Computational Creationism. American Scientist, 87(5):392-396, 1999.
 
7
P. N. Kugler and M. T. Turvey. Information, Natural Law, and the Self-Assembly of Rhythmic Movement. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987.
 
8
F. L. Lambert. Shuffled Cards, Messy Desks, and Disorderly Dorm Rooms - Examples of Entropy Increase? Nonsense! Journal of Chemical Education, 76:1385, 1999.
 
9
F. L. Lambert. The Second Law of Thermodynamics. 2000. Web Page, http://www.secondlaw.com/.
 
10
J. Lukkarinen. Re: continuing on Entropy. 2000. Email Archive, http://necsi.org:8100/Lists/complex-science/ Message/2236.html.
 
11
V. D. Parunak. 'Go to the Ant': Engineering Principles from Natural Agent Systems. Annals of Operations Research, 75:69-101, 1997.
12
 
13
Peeters, P. Valckenaers, J. Wyns, and S. Brueckner. Manufacturing Control Algorithm and Architecture. In Proceedings of Second International Workshop on Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, pages 877-888, K.U. Leuven, 1999.
 
14
 
15
ithsonian Institution. Encyclopedia Smithsonian: Pheromones in Insects. 1999. Web Page, http://www.si.edu/resource/faq/nmnh/buginfo/pheromones.ht m.

CITED BY  17

Collaborative Colleagues:
H. Van Dyke Parunak: colleagues
Sven Brueckner: colleagues