ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Iceberg-cube computation with PC clusters
Full text PdfPdf (278 KB)
Source International Conference on Management of Data archive
Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data table of contents
Santa Barbara, California, United States
Pages: 25 - 36  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-332-4
Also published in ...
Authors
Raymond T. Ng  Univ British Columbia, 2366 Main Mall, UBC, Vancouver, BC
Alan Wagner  Univ British Columbia, 2366 Main Mall, UBC, Vancouver, BC
Yu Yin  Univ British Columbia, 2366 Main Mall, UBC, Vancouver, BC
Sponsor
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 47,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/375663.375666
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we investigate the approach of using low cost PC cluster to parallelize the computation of iceberg-cube queries. We concentrate on techniques directed towards online querying of large, high-dimensional datasets where it is assumed that the total cube has net been precomputed. The algorithmic space we explore considers trade-offs between parallelism, computation and I/0. Our main contribution is the development and a comprehensive evaluation of various novel, parallel algorithms. Specifically: (1) Algorithm RP is a straightforward parallel version of BUC [BR99]; (2) Algorithm BPP attempts to reduce I/0 by outputting results in a more efficient way; (3) Algorithm ASL, which maintains cells in a cuboid in a skiplist, is designed to put the utmost priority on load balancing; and (4) alternatively, Algorithm PT load-balances by using binary partitioning to divide the cube lattice as evenly as possible.

We present a thorough performance evaluation on all these algorithms on a variety of parameters, including the dimensionality of the cube, the sparseness of the cube, the selectivity of the constraints, the number of processors, and the size of the dataset. A key finding is that it is not a one-algorithm-fit-all situation. We recommend a “recipe” which uses PT as the default algorithm, but may also deploy ASL under specific circumstances.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
9
10
 
11
M. Kamber, J. Han and J. Chiang. Metarule-guided mining of multi-dimensional association rules using data cubes. In Proc. 1997 KDD, pp. 207-210.
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
19

CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Raymond T. Ng: colleagues
Alan Wagner: colleagues
Yu Yin: colleagues